Enable Searching for Electronic Collection Service values as well as Collection and Portfolio values

Eg Proxy Enabled (Service)

as well as
Proxy Enabled (Electronic Portfolio)
and
Proxy Enabled (Electronic Collection)

An exported portfolio from Alma looks like this:

<item type="electronic">

<title>Operations research.</title>

<title>Operations Research</title>

<issn>0030-364X</issn>

<coverage>

  <from>

    <year>1952</year>

    <volume>1</volume>

    <issue>1</issue>

  </from>

  <embargo>

    <days_not_available>720</days_not_available>

  </embargo>

</coverage>

<eissn>1526-5463</eissn>

<object_type>JOURNAL</object_type>

</item>

However, that's not very clear. An ISSN element under an electronic item can be interpreted as the ISSN for the electronic publication.

A better structure would be something like this:

<item type="electronic">

<title>Operations research.</title>

<title>Operations Research</title>

<issn type="electronic">0030-364X</issn>

<issn type="print">1526-5463</issn>

<issn-l>1526-5463</issn-l>

<coverage>

  <from>

    <year>1952</year>

    <volume>1</volume>

    <issue>1</issue>

  </from>

  <embargo>

    <days_not_available>720</days_not_available>

  </embargo>

</coverage>

<object_type>JOURNAL</object_type>

</item>

This is related to this idea: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/32344600-export-the-print-issn-for-electronic-portfolios-m

When viewing electronic collection/service/portfolio records, the note tab does not show active - a blue triangle in new UX - when content has been added to the functional notes - authentication and/or public. I understand that currently the content indicator "turns on" when content is added via the "Add Note" feature but it would help workflow if staff did not have to click the notes field to discover if authentication or public notes had been added to either collection, service or portfolio editor. Let the notes tab show active whether the notes are functional or internal.

It is possible to activate electronic collections from the CZ more than once in your NZ. We are aware there are use cases where this is the desired behaviour.

Yet it would be nice if there was a short dialogue: "The collection is already active in your NZ. Are you sure you want to activate it again?" - just to avoid duplicate activation by mistake.

EXL advised us to tick to box "Cancellation restriction" in the POL to mark our journals holdings... even if the feature is at first not what it takes.
Editors require libraries to maintain some subscriptions (holdings) and libraries have to make yearly inventory on these holdings.

Our request : a "holdinds" box to tick to be configured on Electronic Portfolio Editor level.

Sometimes, the information in the reports bears no resemblance to what’s in the CZ Updates Task List. For example, the 'portfolio linked to different bibliographic record' information isn't included in the CZ Updates Task List at all so you have to submit a SF case each time if you want to find out which portfolios were moved and which records are involved.

It would be useful to have clickable counters in the 'Synchronize jobs from CZ’ job reports that take you through to the corresponding changes in the CZ Updates Task List.

To a physical item, is it possible to add an inventory number both manually or - if configured the sequence - with the function "Allocate" to enter the next number.
For the ebook acquired in way "pick and choose", it is necessary the same function, with sequence number, price and date of inventory.

For those waiting for review licenses, we will have status "Draft" and review status "In Review". These licenses are waiting to be checked and the fields are not verified for correctness. But now once the licenses are created with inventory added, all licenses are displayed out for the user, even with status “Draft” and “In Review”.

It will be great if only the licenses with “active” and “accepted” status can be displayed, but not the “Draft” and “In review” license that they are waiting to be verified.

Several times I will come across a portfolio of collection and would like to be able to see who activated the resource. Since we have a history tab, why doesn't this show who activated?

For a bether overwiev show the note addedd in collection service also under Edit collection. Saves a lot of work.
Note is a great field.

The portfolio loader tool can only create inventory by matching on ISSN, ISBN and PID. It does not match on MMS ID. This is an issue when creating electronic portfolios for theses/dissertations or source material that do not have an ISSN/ISBN.

Post-migration side effect with created portfolios: the url from the bib is created in the new portfolio. This url remains in the portfolio even after it has been changed at a later date (not in an editable field; the url is also searchable even after it has been changed. So, old urls from a migrated system remain searchable and in the portfolio record even after editing. Change this behavior.

When setting Coverage Information, current embargo options are to enter a number of months or years. Some publishers have a 2 week, or 14 day embargo; we cannot enter embargo information for these. Adding a Day and/or Week option would allow this information to be added.

When you're working in the "Unassigned" tab of the Electronic Resource Activation Task List, it always reverts to the "Assigned to Me" tab after you delete a task. I want it to stay in the "Unassigned" tab.

Currently, it's not possible to remove parser override values using the change portfolio job. This would be helpful when clearing those values from a collection of portfolios after the CZ portfolios have been updated by Ex Libris.