When direct linking is enabled, Leganto displays a "View Online" link for every citation regardless of whether or not it is actually available online. Availability is only calculated after the user clicks "View Online." If the item is not available, they are redirected to a blank screen with the message: "No full text available". This is an unnecessarily confusing and frustrating user experience and different from how direct linking works in Primo, where "View Online" only appears when full text is available. This enhancement would allow availability to be calculated when the reading list is loaded to avoid confusion and provide Leganto users with accurate availability information.

Hi,
Ideal Scenario:
We currently have a citation processing rule set to automatically trigger a purchase request, if a book has a particular tag, and there are no E versions of the P available in repository. If there is an E copy available then the purchase request should not be triggered. If no E version is available, but the citation meets all other parameters in that particular citation processing rule, then a purchase request should automatically be triggered

Issue:
The problem at the moment is that, Leganto is not relating our E version to our P, and so is still triggering a purchase requests even though an E version is available. This is due to our institution cataloguing E and P as 2 separate Marc records, and many of these do not have a linking ISBN in the 020 field. This would be similar to a lot of other institutions who don't merge the marc records together, as keeping them separate is considered to many as cataloguing best practice.

Solution:
To display real time availability for citations, Leganto does however use merge rules for records in Alma (and their related records) and records in Primo, including dedup'd records (see attached image). This therefore displays P and E versions of the same title together. Can we request for this same 'Merging repository availability' rule to be used as the basis for citation processing rules. It proves to be more successful in linking P and E versions of the same title together.

We often produce reading lists (RL) for courses that only have syllabus selected by the student. These lists don't include any citations, but often have information essential to the students. Our problem is that we can't find a way to retrieve these RLs in analytics, together with RLs that include citations.

Gal Darom said in May 2019 (in the ListServ...), when I asked for help to find all RLs associated to courses:
The relation (data schema) between Courses -> Lists is done through the citations measure, and looks like that “Course -> Citations ->Lists”
The outcome of this relation explain your founding's:
A report that present Courses associated to RL – will not present RL that does not have citations because those RL are not part of the data.
He concluded: A report presenting empty lists associated to a course is not available looking at the data model.

Even if we just try to find all RLs (associated or not to courses), we can't retrieve the RLs without any citations.
We like to have the data schema not including citations as a mandatory measure, or at least allow NULL-values. It should be enough to use the ReadingListCode or ReadingListId to get a full report on both reading lists with citations and without.

Many websites, such as Facebook, Youtube and Gmail are no longer supporting old versions of Internet Explorer. Older versions of Internet Explorer(IE) have security problems which will never be fixed and using it will leave you vulnerable to all sorts of problems on the internet.

Suggestion: Users receive a message saying that their browser does not meet the minimum requirements for accessing Leganto upon trying to log in with an unsupported browser. They may still be able to log in, but will not be able to view/use Leganto effectively. This has been done for other systems, see for example the attached picture for the message IE-users of Canvas LMS receive.

As of now, Microsoft only supports the following desktop operating systems with Internet Explorer browsers:
Windows 10 -> Internet Explorer 11
Windows 8.1 Update -> Internet Explorer 11
Windows 7 SP1 -> Internet Explorer 11
(see full list of operating systems that support IE11: https://support.microsoft.com/en-au/help/17454/lifecycle-faq-internet-explorer)

So this could be used as criteria for which users receive the message. And to avoid making reading lists inaccessible for non-logged in users I suggest that Ex Libris only shows the message for users attempting to log in.

Once Ex Libris finally deprecates support for Internet Explorer completely, all users trying to log in to Leganto with Internet Explorer should receive this message.

Currently the 'Reports' link (attached) in Leganto just links to an 'out the box' analytics dashboard displaying a range of usage information.

It would be useful to be able to define a path to our own Analytics dashboard in an Alma code table, e.g. in Fulfilment > Leganto > Customer Settings.

Our analytics report would be set to receive filters/parameters from Leganto, i.e. reading list codes.

Academic engagement forms a significant part of the work we do with reading lists, so being able to be flexible and responsive to their needs/wishes in terms of usage of their lists would definitely be a benefit for us.

Sometimes instructors perform a citation search in Leganto and just add the first result that comes up in the search results; often this is actually a book review or other format that isn't logical for reserves. Additionally, most instructors are searching and expecting the latest edition to appear first in the list. Other faculty from certain departments want to choose a particular edition, and so need edition information prominently surfaced in the search result.

This results in processing delays as staff must check with instructors to clarify what items they really intended to place on reserve.

One possible solution may be to offer an option for faculty to specially indicate that the submitted citation must be filled as specified (format/edition). Something could indicate that by default, any available edition can be substituted for the one added to the list as a result of search.

Physical (print) and electronic (ebook) availability cannot be added as columns in these Analytics subject areas. This would be hugely beneficial for most of our daily reports and workflows as we try to ensure that a certain number of copies or electronic versions are available for resources added to reading lists.

An additional requirement is for availability to be shown for records related to the citation. This is because we have separate title records for physical (print) holdings and electronic (ebook) portfolios, and use the related_records parameter in Leganto Customer Settings to display availability for all available formats at citation level.