Thank you for changing some filters into facets, but in order to make better use of this functionality, we would like to add more facets.
It would be a great improvement if we could have Academic Department, Course Terms and Assignee as facets as well.
Then we could easily sort the list to match each liasion librarians need for easy overview to his/her's Reading List Task List.
The facets we have today doesn't help very much in order to filter the list into a manageable task list.
Maybe it could be possible to customize the facets in the same way as we customize the view in Alma?

As Library staff, I would like the Roll Over List button to be placed at a more obvious spot in Leganto, so instructors can easily find the button and Rollover their Lists with fewer clicks.

UNSW Library will enable the Leganto Course Instructor Rollover in November 2018. We want instructors to use this feature, and not be confused with the Duplicate List option.

Current Behavior:
1. Instructor opens a Reading List in Leganto
2. clicks on Reading list options menu option
3. selects "Roll Over List", which is beneath "Duplicate List"
Concerns:
a. They need to know where the button is
b. They need to understand the difference between Duplicate List and Roll Over List
c. The Library want to encourage instructors to use Rollover instead of Duplicate.

Proposed Behavior:
1. Instructor opens a Reading List in Leganto
2. clicks on a ROLL OVER LIST button which is next to "SEND LIST" button
Benefits:
a. Fewer steps for instructors
b. Button can be easily found
c. Tooltips can be used for the button (same as the "SEND LIST" tooltip), to help instructors to understand what this function does
d. Prevent instructors from clicking on Duplicate List button either accidentally or due to lack of understanding on the differences between the 2 functionalities

We think the field for material type should be moved to the top of the Editing form.
This makes sense for several reasons.
- It makes sense to define a document before registering it, and that’s where cataloguers start.
- Different document types have different sets of fields, and choosing the material type first would ensure that the instructor starts registering in the correct form.
- When changing the material type during the process, some fields may move or disappear, including fields the instructor had just been working on, leading to a poor user experience.
- User creating a chapter citation naturally start filling in the title field with the chapter title, only to discover that this field was for the book title when changing the material type = double work = poor user experience.

Please have a look at the attached document for full description with pictures.

Hi,
Here are a few suggestions regarding the number of participants as shown in Alma:
1. When controlling a list where several campuses are involved, only the campuses are indicated, not the number of students per campus.
We would like this information to be visible here. It would make it easier to decide if more copies should be bought, or if the library of another campus should have a look at the list.
2. When associating a list to a course in Leganto, the information about the number of students per campus is missing as well (only for the total number of students) (NB: modify_course_details = true):

We would like the number per campus to be visible there, and editable.

When users first enter Leganto via the LTI, before they have created a list for the current course, they see a splash screen with options to Create a new list from scratch or upload a list. A better option would be to replace the Upload button with a Reuse button, so that it is easy for users to get to the right place to find previous lists to reuse. Reusing a list from a previous semester is by far the largest use case for our faculty, and the splash screen makes it very difficult to see how to do that. Currently users have to click the link that says "Leave this page and explore the application," but it's not clear that that is what they need to choose in order to find their old lists. Please see attached mockup.

Once a Leganto user has liked a citation, they are not able to change their mind and "unlike" it.

Across social media the pattern is that “likes” can be removed – and this is what our students/instructors would expect.

• In training, or in class when demonstrating the feature, and then wanting to reverse it
• Accidentally clicking the Like
• Liking a citation, and then realising it was a different one that you wanted to like
• Liking a citation and then changing your mind

Consideration should be given to whether liking/unliking is locked once a list is "inactive". Perhaps this could be configurable by institution.

Some institutions may wish to turn off "Liking" altogether.

In Q1 2019, we plan to have some modifications to the Leganto "send list" functionality.
SEND LIST button in Leganto will only be enabled when a change made to the list after the last time it was send for review. If no change made in the list, the send button will be disabled.
When SEND LIST is enabled and active, it will be more visible (i.e. animation) to attract the eye of the instructor.
As part of this enhancement, we plan to entirely separate the Send List to Library functionality from the Publish List functionality.
Currently, publishing a list also sends the list to the library for processing: it changes the list and citations statuses from Being Prepared to Ready for Processing, updates the list’s Requested for Review On date, and creates a task for the library.
The new functionality is that the above changes will happen only if the instructor selects Send List. Publishing the list will change only the Publication Status.

We wanted to update you and to receive any remarks you might have on this change of functionality.

Miriam, Leganto BA