Ex Libris completed an enhancement to add an instructor role to an Alma user via LTI. This is great but we need this for instructional staff who support teaching staff, but have canvas system level permissions rather than individual course permissions.

There are additional roles in Canvas (and perhaps other CMS systems) that should add an instructor role in Alma, as well:

| Canvas Role | LTI String | Desired Alma Role
| Teacher | Instructor | Instructor
| TA | urn:lti:role:ims/lis/TeachingAssistant | Instructor
| Designer | Content Developer | Instructor
| Account Admin | urn:lti:instrole:ims/lis/Administrator | Instructor

We would like to see these roles trigger addition of the Alma instructor role in the LTI launch.

Broken links alerts are most likely to be checked by a central team in the first instance.

Current workflow is unnecessarily long to identify and fix citations with newly broken links:
Reading List Task list
Select citations with broken links.
Choose a list to Work on
Filter list by Broken Links alert
Once the citation link has been resolved, they need to return to the Task List to identify the next list with a broken link

Preferred workflow:
Reading List Task list
Select citations with broken links.
This should take you to the Citations List (not the Reading Lists area) prefiltered by Citations with a broken link alert.
Staff can then work their way through all the citations with a broken link in turn.

A newly duplicated reading list remains attached to the same course as the original from which the duplicated reading list was made. We would expect that when a list has been duplicated a prompt box is generated which gives the user the option to associate the reading list with the original course or re-associate it with an updated course for a different academic year.

User story

As an academic I would like to duplicate the current year's reading list which is attached to a course for 2016/17 and create a reading list for 2017/18. Within this list duplication process I would then like to have the option to change the course to 2017/18 at the same time. A prompt box at the point of reading list duplication giving me the option to re-associate the duplicated list to an alternative course would ensure that I associate my reading list with the correct virtual learning environment for that academic year.

It would streamline the workflow significantly if Citation Alert Notes which are represented by the green dot in the Reading List View could include what contents of the Note actually are. This would save the workflow 3 extra clicks into the citation to edit it, checking the Notes Tab and having to then back out again to the Reading List. There is also significant work in having to clear an Alert once seen and or action, where the staff member has to select the citation, scroll to the top of the list, choose the Actions Menu, and select the Remove Alerts option. It would be much simpler and faster for the Alert to simply be removed when a staff member selects the Alerts Tab. Once they have selected the Alerts Tab, the Alert and its contents are then seen, the Alert is cleared, and the staff member can act on the Alert before moving on. Even allowing Alerts to just be cleared from the … More Options menu for that citation would be a great improvement.

See an example of where Note content could be displayed to the user in the attached.

At present the only option for integrating StackMap into Leganto is to use an Integration profile of "Discovery Interface" type. This forces the integration to display in Primo as well as Leganto.

We are using custom javascript in Primo for a superior user experience of the maps, and do not want to compromise that by having the integration profile create additional sub-par map views.

Our preferred option would be for the same user experience in Leganto as Primo. A fallback option would be to have a separate integration profile of type "Leganto" independent of the "Discovery Interface" profile. This is not ideal as the integration profile does not pass all of the metadata that StackMap uses for the best display of their maps.

Current scenario: student marks a link as broken, we filter in Alma to find the citations with Report of broken link. We fix this if it is broken but just as frequently we are unable to identify any reason for the report.

We need to be able to respond to the student to alert them to the fact that we have fixed the link, alert them to the fact that it coincided with reported downtime for a resource or contact them to investigate why they are unable to access the resource (when there does not appear to be a problem).

We would expect the user ID and the date and time of report to appear in the Citation list.

If we have both print and ebook versions of a title then there will be two separate bibliographic records, both of which should have the alternate format ISBN added to the 020 $$z field (so that a relationship is formed).

Because both records have the same ISBN, the citation will display as 'Multiple Resources Located' if added via Cite It. This requires a member of library staff to manually intervene and select one of the records to Resource Locate. This is an unnecessary additional step, as availability for both related records should be shown in Leganto anyway.

Could Resource Locate allow for citations to attach to both related records, or prioritise the record where the matching ISBN is in 020 $$a rather than $$z?