When users first enter Leganto via the LTI, before they have created a list for the current course, they see a splash screen with options to Create a new list from scratch or upload a list. A better option would be to replace the Upload button with a Reuse button, so that it is easy for users to get to the right place to find previous lists to reuse. Reusing a list from a previous semester is by far the largest use case for our faculty, and the splash screen makes it very difficult to see how to do that. Currently users have to click the link that says "Leave this page and explore the application," but it's not clear that that is what they need to choose in order to find their old lists. Please see attached mockup.

Once a Leganto user has liked a citation, they are not able to change their mind and "unlike" it.

Across social media the pattern is that “likes” can be removed – and this is what our students/instructors would expect.

• In training, or in class when demonstrating the feature, and then wanting to reverse it
• Accidentally clicking the Like
• Liking a citation, and then realising it was a different one that you wanted to like
• Liking a citation and then changing your mind

Consideration should be given to whether liking/unliking is locked once a list is "inactive". Perhaps this could be configurable by institution.

Some institutions may wish to turn off "Liking" altogether.

In Q1 2019, we plan to have some modifications to the Leganto "send list" functionality.
SEND LIST button in Leganto will only be enabled when a change made to the list after the last time it was send for review. If no change made in the list, the send button will be disabled.
When SEND LIST is enabled and active, it will be more visible (i.e. animation) to attract the eye of the instructor.
As part of this enhancement, we plan to entirely separate the Send List to Library functionality from the Publish List functionality.
Currently, publishing a list also sends the list to the library for processing: it changes the list and citations statuses from Being Prepared to Ready for Processing, updates the list’s Requested for Review On date, and creates a task for the library.
The new functionality is that the above changes will happen only if the instructor selects Send List. Publishing the list will change only the Publication Status.

We wanted to update you and to receive any remarks you might have on this change of functionality.

Miriam, Leganto BA

When processing a reading list, library staff set each individual item as complete as they arrive for the reserve shelf and are ready to be used. Library staff must then take an additional step to mark the entire list as complete, even though each individual item has already been marked as complete.

Currently functionality requires the reserves managers to find outstanding requests by reading list and not by outstanding citation when more than one person works on reserves. This results in a very time-intensive process for units who hold reserves on a large scale.

Desired functionality is to have the list be marked complete automatically to remove the need to take an additional step to complete the list. This would also prevent time spent cleaning up lists which were not properly marked as complete as part of the regular workflow.

Sometimes instructors perform a citation search in Leganto and just add the first result that comes up in the search results; often this is actually a book review or other format that isn't logical for reserves. Additionally, most instructors are searching and expecting the latest edition to appear first in the list. Other faculty from certain departments want to choose a particular edition, and so need edition information prominently surfaced in the search result.

This results in processing delays as staff must check with instructors to clarify what items they really intended to place on reserve.

One possible solution may be to offer an option for faculty to specially indicate that the submitted citation must be filled as specified (format/edition). Something could indicate that by default, any available edition can be substituted for the one added to the list as a result of search.

When working in Citations view, we frequently have the need to know which citations belong to which processing department in order to batch process citations. Currently functionality does now allow us to view citations by processing department. Therefore we must instead go into each reading list in order to investigate which citations are not yet marked as compete. It would be much more efficient to be able to filter on and view a complete list of citations that need attention.

We also use the term field to help differentiate courses. Neither the reading lists view nor the citations view allows us to filter by term, which makes it difficult to find the work that needs your attention now (in the current term). The ideal solution for us would be to allow us to sort the citations view by term.

To ensure that the LTI link works between our LMS and Alma we have to create a Course Record for all units that utilise the LMS. This results in thousands of Course Records being created in Alma each semester. However since not all units in the LMS use a Reading List only a fraction of these Course Records eventually have a Reading List attached. Therefore we have a lot of empty Course Records in Alma cluttering up the Course area in Alma and resulting in some confusion for Library staff in identifying active, current courses.

This problem will only continue to grow as we import thousands more empty courses each semester.

For this reason we would like an easy way within Alma or in Analytics to be able to identify Course Records that do not have a Reading List attached. Although there is a field in Analytics for 'Reading List Associated to a Course', filtering this field to "No" does not provide a list of Courses that do not have a Reading List attached. It would be incredibly useful if we could also run a job that will delete Courses without reading lists attached in bulk easily.

As Library staff, I would like the Roll Over List button to be placed at a more obvious spot in Leganto, so instructors can easily find the button and Rollover their Lists with fewer clicks.

UNSW Library will enable the Leganto Course Instructor Rollover in November 2018. We want instructors to use this feature, and not be confused with the Duplicate List option.

Current Behavior:
1. Instructor opens a Reading List in Leganto
2. clicks on Reading list options menu option
3. selects "Roll Over List", which is beneath "Duplicate List"
Concerns:
a. They need to know where the button is
b. They need to understand the difference between Duplicate List and Roll Over List
c. The Library want to encourage instructors to use Rollover instead of Duplicate.

Proposed Behavior:
1. Instructor opens a Reading List in Leganto
2. clicks on a ROLL OVER LIST button which is next to "SEND LIST" button
Benefits:
a. Fewer steps for instructors
b. Button can be easily found
c. Tooltips can be used for the button (same as the "SEND LIST" tooltip), to help instructors to understand what this function does
d. Prevent instructors from clicking on Duplicate List button either accidentally or due to lack of understanding on the differences between the 2 functionalities