Skip to content

Alma

Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Alma by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.

We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.

For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

156 results found

  1. Admin - Create a set - how many records are in my set without opening the set

    Why cant we see on the list of sets pages how many records are in each list?
    Surely that can be shown without having to open endless sets...

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Admin - Sets and analytics - remove from a set more than 50 at a time

    When duplicating a list - we tend to duplicate sets to test functionality on a small group of records before applying a new update to thousands of records - there has to be an easier way to remove records from a set than selecting 50 and removing 50 at a time...

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Analytics report for POLs cancelled or closed in specified Fiscal Periods

    Provide an Analytics report that identifies Purchase Order Lines (POLs) cancelled or closed within user-selected Fiscal Periods. Libraries need to analyse cancellations and closures by fiscal year or accounting period for budgeting, supplier review, collection management, and audit purposes. Current reporting options do not easily support filtering by the fiscal period in which a POL was cancelled or closed. This enhancement would improve financial reporting accuracy, support year-end analysis, and reduce the need for complex workarounds or external data processing.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Allow custom Dewey Classification searches in Consortial Analytics

    In Consortial Analytics, the Dewey Classification search only allows users to select predefined three-digit classifications (as shown in the attached screenshot). This limits the search to broad subject categories. For the purpose of collection development analysis, it would be useful to have the option to search using custom Dewey Decimal numbers, as this would enable more targeted searches.

    15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Incorporate All AI Metric Types/Access Method from recent 5.1.1 COUNTER Standard Update into Analytics

    Counter Standards were recently updated to incorporate new metric types and new access methods for AI Bot Traffic within COUNTER standards (https://www.countermetrics.org/code-of-practice/best-practice/bp-ai/). Requesting that Ex Libris incorporate all metric types and the new access methods into analytics.

    85 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Add "Available for Group" record fields to Analytics

    Currently, Analytics exposes which groups have Available for Group records, but it doesn't expose the other fields in those records.

    For example, Analytics can show that a collection is available for Group A and Group F, and it can show that Electronic Collection Proxy Enabled is set to Yes at the collection level; however, it can't show whether proxy is enabled for Group A or Group F.

    For Network Zones, and institutions that make extensive use of Available for Groups, the lack of access to these fields in Analytics means we can't periodically audit and correct configuration inconsistencies and data…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Add Analytics support to compare "Available for Group" settings on electronic collections and services

    Currently, Analytics can show Available for Groups on the electronic service or, if none exist there (if they're inherited from the electronic collection), then on the electronic collection.

    However, we can't report on discrepancies between collection-level and service-level groups.

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Wildcard search for MMS ID.

    When working in conjunction with Excel, pasting MMS ID will be limited by the floating point standard and truncate the the last 3 digits to '000'. Only just realised this, having wildcard search would allow me to at least more efficiently identify and retrieve the now corrupted MMS ID I've been pasting into Excel.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Allow faster 'All titles export' in UI by adding option to only download titles' MMS ID

    We are grateful for 30 local parameters in Alma Analytics, but frankly could use way more (i.e. as many as the number of MARC fields that we use that are not already available in Analytics. For example '035' is available in Analytics via 'Network Number'). Sometimes to get Analytics to output what we need, we must run the search in Alma first. However, the 'All titles export' is intolerably slow for as few as 5K bib records. Possibly, if the Tech team thinks that 'All titles export' UI time could be shortened by adding an option to output/export only MMS…

    12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Analytics Authorities Locals Deletes

    We need an analytics report for deleted authorities in which we can determine the type of vocabulary it belongs to. We made an incident on the Alma support portal "10583316", and they gave us this explanation and suggest us to report a new idea:

    "The Analytics behavior for authorities is that the vocabulary code is not displayed for deleted authority records. This is because the MMS ID is taken from the MMS record table, which preserves information on both live and deleted records, while the Vocabulary Code is taken from the authority heading table, which preserves information only on live…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Keep deleted Alma objects in Analytics

    When I delete Alma objects such as PO lines, Purchase orders, course requests, invoices, purchase requests, they are deleted in Analytics as well. On the contrary, even if deleted in Alma, objects like bibliographic records or physical items are still accessible in Analytics.
    It would be great if other Alma objects were also accessible in Analytics even if deleted.

    20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Separate 655 genre/form from Subjects in Analytics

    Since Library of Congress are putting more emphasis on genre/form (MARC 655) and removing the $v Form subdivisions, it would be helpful to separate the 655 searching as genre/form from the broader Subjects field (600, 610, 611, 630, 650, 651 etc) in Alma Analytics. There is already a separate Genre search in Alma advanced search which is very useful.

    10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Attachment presence and names in Analytics reports

    We would like to use Alma to store vendor VPATs, and I'd like to be able to run a report that tells me which VPATs we have or do not have. I don't see any ability to add an Attachments (is empty/is not empty) in any analytics subject area, currently.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Alma Analytics: Cost per Use - calculate use on all platforms

    When using Alma Analytics for cost per use reports, only use from the chosen COUNTER Platform are calculated. In part, this is because in Electronic Portfolio Editor, only one COUNTER Platform may be chosen. This is a problem for our Ovid Journal collections as Ovid records use across three platforms. We would like all use to be calculated in Alma Analytic Cost per Use reports, whether this be solved by allowing us to choose multiple platforms in Alma or have Alma Analytics calculate all use, not just the COUNTER Platform chosen in Alma.

    36 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Enhance Analytics Support for Authority Records (Additional MARC Fields)

    We would like to propose an enhancement to Alma Analytics for authority records.

    Currently, Alma Analytics provides limited support for authority fields, such as 1XX and 373. However, many other important MARC authority fields are not available for reporting and analysis.

    We recommend adding more authority fields to Analytics, including but not limited to:

    046 – Special coded dates (commonly used for birth and death dates of authors)
    372 – Field of activity
    374 – Occupation
    375 – Gender

    These fields are widely used in authority records and are highly valuable for data analysis, authority control, and research purposes.

    Providing…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Counting Searches in Alma Persistent Search Box

    We know that the usage actions in Primo VE can be retrieved in Analytics to measure patrons’ various search actions. This helps library identify the strengths and limitations of current Primo VE user interface, and review it to better meet patrons’ needs.

    However, there is currently NO way to retrieve search counts from Alma’s search persistent box in Analytics.

    Counting Searches in Alma Persistent Search Box

    Library staff often use the Alma persistent search box to search for records for various library operations—for example, locating a bibliographic record to create a PO line—across the institution and community zones (and the…

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Add Resource Sharing partner address information to Alma Analytics

    Information should include street, city, state, zip code, country, and latitude and longitude. This information is essential for creating reports showing where ILL items are coming from or going to. This would enable us to create reports showing how much borrowing and lending we do by regions, internationally, and make it possible to create maps that we can use to promote our services to patrons, library staff and university administration.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Expand coverage of the 'single' ISBN and ISSN fields in the Analytics 'Titles' subject area

    The fields 'ISBN Valid Single (Normalized)' and 'ISSN Valid Single (Normalized)' in the 'Titles' subject area are useful for matching purposes. However those fields only cover ISBNs/ISSNs from MARC bibliographic field 020a. Sometimes we're looking to match Alma records to sources which might use older identifiers, that appear instead in 020z, 776z, 022l, 022a and/or 776x respectively in the Alma records. Those MARC fields' contents are reportable in the general 'ISBN' and 'ISSN' Analytics fields, but those Analytics fields don't provide each identifier on its own row. Additional, expanded versions of the 'ISBN single' and 'ISSN single' fields (perhaps named…

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Subject headings's in Analytics

    "Subjects" in analytics (6XX MARC fields) are all jumbled up in one index. This creates a problem for analysis of correctly applied LCSH subject headings (our focus). AND, 2nd indicator signifies the type of subject heading, such as LCSH "0"; NLM "2"; etc. Currently, working with the subject index, it is impossible to filter for the type of subject heading needed in an analytics report, even though the MARC variable fields contain this data. Therefore, it would be very useful to filter for the types of subject headings we would like to see in a report, without losing recall (i.e,…

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. System Events Subject Area: Add "Record was Created", "Record was Updated", "Record was Deleted" for Holdings PIDs

    As Alma administrators, we want CRUD actions on Holdings Records to be logged in Analytics via the System Events Subject Area, allowing us to monitor what changes were made, when, and by which users.

    Currently, the System Event subject area does not track the creation, update, or deletion of holdings records. Adding this functionality would provide valuable insight into how often these actions are performed by staff. This data would support performance reporting and make it also easier to identify the number of modified records when metadata corrections are needed.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
  • Don't see your idea?