Skip to content

Alma

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Alma by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.

We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.

For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.

How can we improve Alma?

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

3 results found

  1. Change massively the Pattern type and Linking number, both item fields

    We would like to massively change the Pattern type and Linking number fields. It can not be done either via API or with Job(Change physical items).
    The purpose of these massive changes at the item level (fascicles) is the automatic creation of field 866 in the MARC record for each journal holding according to the fascicles received in Alma. In our case, it is essential to make this massive change but it can not be done via job or via API.

    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Knowledge_Articles/Create_Summary_field_866867868

    10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Preview Mode Features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Preview Mode Features

    This is a new category to help give Alma Product Management direct feedback on new 'Preview Mode' features that will be released from time to time. Stay tuned for more details

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Preview Mode Features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. More options for corporate and special libraries.

    The Institutional Analytics Profile is focused on academic libraries. We are a corporate library with no students (we have researchers and scientists) and no schools.

    There is not an option for Not Relevant for "Total undergraduate student body size" or "Does your library serve any of the following professional graduate schools?"

    Could a question exist for the number of researchers or scientists?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Preview Mode Features  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
  • Don't see your idea?

Alma

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)