Nancy Babb
My feedback
43 results found
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
99 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
From recent testing in our Primo VE instance, it seems like for us the language facet and pre-filter work well enough (or relatively so) with Alma records, but it's CDI where the function doesn't seem to work at all. And of course part of the challenge of troubleshooting in CDI is that we can't see what fields are responsible for a problem. In some records, the CTO suggests that the language value may be coming from a field like rft.place, but in many others, there's no sign of the language being filtered within the metadata or full text. Maybe it's coming from metadata in merged records we can't see? Regardless, this is a major problem for researchers who need to either filter out content they can't read or limit to content within their specific language of choice. Can nothing be done about this? It does clearly seem to be a bug that requires development attention and not suitable for enhancement or idea exchange.
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
I continue to support this Idea and would like to re-open it.
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
It is also very difficult for users who may craft an Advanced Search in Primo blended scopes and then use the Newspapers Search facet expecting to send this Advanced Search into Newspapers -- who then find that their search terms have not been passed to Newspapers but instead lead to a blank search box in Newspapers. This illustrates for us that users are trying to accomplish Advanced Searches for Newspaper content, so it would be extremely helpful for this functionality to be supported.
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
231 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
Please re-open this idea; it has 80 votes.
Nancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
112 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
Proposals https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176/suggestions/15668418 and https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176/suggestions/15668475 are duplicates, with additional attached examples on 15668418. Could they be merged to combine votes?
-
2 votes
Nancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
60 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
Any use we can make of ORCID would be of great benefit; this proposal would correct what seems to be a current error that makes the data not really usable.
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Nancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
179 votes
Hi,
This is to update that this issue is still not planned to be developed in the current road map. We will continue to evaluate it for a future release.
Therefore we are keeping this under "Under review" status.
Best regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
Is there any update on the status of this request? We're wondering about the "Under Review" notation before we submit NERS request for 2023. Thanks!
Nancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
Boosting newer and especially the current edition is really needed -- institutions are trying all sorts of work arounds to make these editions more prominent for users (ex: added to Resource Recommenders). A simpler and more comprehensive approach would help the users greatly.
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
159 votes
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
I agree that this is a very significant problem!
-
40 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
Being able to display additional text in the description would add terrific value to the banner! The current default does not provide quite enough space to share enough info with users -- this proposal would really improve the functionality and improve the experience of the user.
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
200 votes
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
121 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
Here's the css that our webmaster (University at Buffalo Libraries) suggests adding to the css file:
To display the facet select boxes persistently:
.multiselect-facet-group.multiselect-inactive .md-chip md-checkbox {
transform: scaleX(1);
}To display the facet Exclude boxes persistently:
.section-content .md-chips .md-chip .md-chip-remove-container .md-button {
opacity: 1;
}You can see it at https://suny-buf-psb.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?vid=01SUNY_BUF:ExLib_Default_for_Test
-
93 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
It is so disappointing that the statement of responsibility is not displayed in Primo and that it seems impossible to add to the display in Primo VE without many negative impacts on citations, file export, sorting, etc.
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
-
96 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Nancy Babb
commented
All of the suggestions given here would be very useful and helpful to our researchers
-
28 votes
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
131 votes
Nancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
57 votes
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
It would be great and very helpful to our users if this enhancement could be incorporated into NDE development.