Skip to content

AdminYael (yael.shahar@clarivate.com, Ex Libris)

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

1 result found

  1. Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation

    659 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    AdminYael (yael.shahar@clarivate.com, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi all,
    In order to better understand the requirements here -
    today the relation is used in Alma resource management, in Fulfillment calculations and also in the Primo GetIt and facets.
    We would like to ask you where do you see this change impact and under which conditions. We would appreciate any examples and use cases. In which cases the relation is correct, and in which it doesn't.

    Thank you,
    Yael.

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)