Combining searches from search history into a new search
My colleagues misses the functionality from our previous discovery system to combine searches in the search history list into a new search in an easy way, e.g. S1 AND S3

This is to update that this idea is currently under review (also as part of NERS voting - 8258).
-
Manu Schwendener commented
NERS 8258, round 2 open for voting now (2023)
-
Manu Schwendener commented
> under review
This is great news, thank you, Yael.
-
Manu Schwendener commented
NERS 8258, open for voting now (2023).
-
Nancy Babb commented
This proposal was not approved in NERS 2022, but there has also been no update from Ex Libris on this Idea Exchange proposal since March 2020, when additional information was requested. Can Ex Libris please confirm whether more information is still needed, and what the status is? Thanks!
-
Manu Schwendener commented
NERS 7848, open for voting now
-
Manu Schwendener commented
combining two searches with OR could also be used as a workaround for https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/39837130-add-ability-to-select-multiple-options-on-advanced
-
Nancy Babb commented
Are more examples and use cases still needed?
-
Nancy Babb commented
As a very simple example, I may search for some broad topics, like "therapy dogs" and "stress relief" -- and after searching realize that what I actually want is resources related to "therapy dogs" and "stress relief", especially if I find that I get a great number of results with either single search, possibly including non-relevant results. It would be a great time saver to simply be able to combine these two searches via selecting them in Search History and using a boolean operator. (Alternately, one could also opt to include multiple searches with few results via this method.) An indication of the number of results included in each search result would indeed be helpful, too.
-
Nancy Babb commented
I found some ProQuest documentation on "How to Combine Two or More Recent Searches" https://support.proquest.com/articledetail?id=kA1400000008WjbCAE that may be illustrative.
-
Nancy Babb commented
An example of use case is the ability for users to combine their searches in new and different ways; for example, building iterative searches, being able to most efficiently narrow and manage searches. The current functionality mentioned (selecting multiple facets, using advanced search) all require pre-coordination of searching, so a user who wishes to add complexities or refine criteria will always have to re-start the search from scratch. Combining searches is a more sophisticated and efficient and fairly common tool. Are more specific examples required?
-
Manu Schwendener commented
Also show number of results before and after combining.
-
Manu Schwendener commented
Also allow NOT and OR
-
Manu Schwendener commented
+1