Skip to content

Manu_Schwendener

My feedback

118 results found

  1. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    +1

  2. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. 30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Manu_Schwendener shared this idea  · 
  4. 658 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    > In which cases the relation is correct

    Dear Yael

    For the display and functions of Fulfillment / Getit and facets in Primo, only this example is correct

    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&search_scope=UBS&tab=UBS&docid=alma9964782120105504&lang=en&context=L

    it has a MARC field 773 $w

    773 0#$tPro Natura lokal Basel $g2015, Nr. 4, 31 S. $q2015/4/31 $gyr:2015 $gno:2015 $w(IDSBB)001400350DSV01

    ----

    All the other relations should only be visible under Details in the full record display. There they can be a link which leads to the other bib record, but no other function should be generated.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&search_scope=UBS&tab=UBS&docid=alma9972649195905504&lang=en&context=L

    Basel - UB Hauptbibliothek has this title.

    'Show more locations' shows me
    Basel - Uni Geschichte

    who do NOT have this title.

    -----

    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma997632760105504&context=L&vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&lang=en&search_scope=UBS&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=UBS&query=any,contains,3518574701&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9082493689607880698&offset=0

    "Available at ... and other locations"

    This is not true. Only "Basel - Uni Philosophie" has it.

    ---

    This is the only case where we want to show "Locations for related titles":

    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&search_scope=UBS&tab=UBS&docid=alma9964782120105504&lang=en&context=L

    773 0#$tPro Natura lokal Basel $g2015, Nr. 4, 31 S. $q2015/4/31 $gyr:2015 $gno:2015 $w(IDSBB)001400350DSV01

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Dear Yael

    This is great to hear, thank you.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    NERS 8781, open for voting now.

    Please vote to make our catalog less frustrating for our patrons.

    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  5. 114 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    I changed my mind about the naming. As we call FRBR "versions" it would need to be

    Split versions
    Bundle versions

    or something similar, but also using _versions_.

    ---

    I really like what DTU is doing with their display options pulldown menu
    https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=clever, see screenshot

    FRBR on/off could just be added here. We already have the pulldown for the number of titles per page.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    NERS 8870 - Advanced search: turn off FRBR for the results

    Open for voting now.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Hi

    NERS submissions close at the end of this week, and the roadmap will only be presented afterwards. Can somebody from Ex Libris tell me if this is on the roadmap?

    Thank you.

    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  6. 47 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    I like what DTU https://findit.dtu.dk does, see screenshot.

    But they don't have an exclude option for facets, and the AND between the different facet groups is not shown, either.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    > if you could control the Boolean operators

    That would be great, yes.

  7. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    From https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Release_Notes/002Primo_VE/2024/010Primo_VE_2024_Release_Notes?mon=202401BASE

    ”January 2024 SF: 5309566, 5320757, 5326843, 6314072, 6717157, 6796293, 6907653
    When using various types of quotation marks within searches, different results were returned. This has been fixed to return the same results regardless of the type of quotation mark used in the query.”

    Not fixed for me:

    Local records:

    psychische Belastung = 3164
    „psychische Belastung“ = 3262
    «psychische Belastung» = 3264
    “psychische Belastung” = 1931
    "psychische Belastung" = 1931

    CDI records:

    psychische Belastung = 30990
    „psychische Belastung“ = 9906
    «psychische Belastung» = 30990
    “psychische Belastung” = 9906
    "psychische Belastung" = 9906

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    According to the January 2024 release notes this should be fixed (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Release_Notes/002Primo_VE/2024/010Primo_VE_2024_Release_Notes?mon=202401BASE) - it isn't.

  8. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    There are _some_ documentation pages where following per RSS shows me the changes that have been done; see screenshot.

    It's this page https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Knowledge_Articles/NERS?v=7 , and the deciding factor must be that it has a version number.

    This is really helping – it would be great if this could be done for all pages going forward.

    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  9. 163 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Another approach will be coming 2025:
    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Materials/010Roadmap/Alma_Roadmap_Highlights_(2024-2025)/Fulfillment_and_Resource_Sharing#Persistent_Role_Template

    "The system will maintain an ongoing link between the role profile and the user record."

  11. 106 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    > for the Collection Discovery feature

    There's the facet group "New records" in Primo, with "last week", "last month" and "last three months", but they can't be used to build a set that then populates the logical collection.

    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  12. 57 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    +1

  13. 32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Dear Moshe

    Maybe I misunderstand your reply.

    > This option means that no item under the BIB record can be requested when in
    > all holding records there is an item available on shelf

    This is what Renaud describes and where we are missing an additional option to _enable_ requesting the items from the closed stack, no matter if there is one on a shelf somewhere or not.

    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  14. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    This would be great

    Screenshot is from DTU, which has a lot of elegant solutions.

    https://findit.dtu.dk

  15. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Found this under Configuration – Resource Sharing – Request Forms – Note to Patron

    Such a structure would be a huge improvement compared to how we have to manage multilingual labels under Discovery at the moment.

    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  16. 198 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    NERS 8810 Add the ability for patrons to change the default sort

    Open for voting now.

  17. 428 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    NERS 8967, open for voting now.

    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  18. 311 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    NERS 8947, open for voting now.

  19. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    NERS 8992 open for voting now.

  20. 40 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Related:
    NERS 8814 User-defined favorite libraries that get preferential ranking in the Get It section and Libraries facet

    Open for voting now.

← Previous 1 3 4 5 6

Feedback and Knowledge Base