Manu_Schwendener

My feedback

143 results found

  1. 14 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Should this be closed as 'Done' to release the votes?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 
  2. 23 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    +1

  3. 1 vote
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  4. 4 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  5. 147 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  6. 98 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  7. 1 vote
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  8. 24 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    +1

  9. 37 votes
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    GTI, within Rapido

    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Rapido/Product_Documentation/08_Glossary

    "Global Title Index (GTI)

    Index of records from institutions that are Rapido members. When selecting the global index, you are actually searching in the Discovery Rapido Global Title Index + CDI."

    The problem is that the titles can't be suppressed when the patrons have no way to get to the full text.

  10. 1 vote
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    I agree that the display of the active Resource Type Filter needs to be more obvious.

    I do not agree that it should revert to All when switching the search scope, though.

  11. 6 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    If you haven't already, you might want to ask about this in the Primo mailing list.

  12. 1 vote
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    +1

  13. 47 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    This is not about Collection Discovery *, but about the hierarchical presentation of for example a collection of letters, correct?

    * example https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/collectionDiscovery?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&collectionId=81362795860005504&lang=en

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Could somebody maybe add an example of how it looks at the moment in their catalog and what they would want to change?

    Thank you

  14. 38 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  15. 206 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    +1

  16. 56 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    +1

  17. 1 vote
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Do you know that you can show the locations as a facet already, at least in Primo VE?

    Example https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/search?query=any,contains,vincent&tab=UBS&search_scope=UBS&vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&lang=en&offset=0 -> facet "Location"


    (I won't see your reply automatically, sorry.)

  18. 47 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Maybe to help understand our situation at the moment:

    1) Books from the open stacks have to be fetched by the patrons themselves, they can't be requested to a pickup library
    2) Our IZ has a free local courier service; our libraries are placed all over the city
    3) When we have a second copy in the closed stacks of an item in open stacks, the second copy can not be requested via the local courier (= with another pickup library in our IZ than the one owning the books), although the item policy would allow it.

    We would like to be able to change 3).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Dear Moshe

    Maybe I misunderstand your reply.

    > This option means that no item under the BIB record can be requested when in
    > all holding records there is an item available on shelf

    This is what Renaud describes and where we are missing an additional option to _enable_ requesting the items from the closed stack, no matter if there is one on a shelf somewhere or not.

    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  19. 320 votes
    13 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    For comparison see https://swisscollections.ch/Record/991057940819705501?sid=126841 (Alice's example), scroll to and open "Hierarchy / Context"

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    List of fields for which this change should be made. Others please add if something is missing.

    MARC 21:

    773 for analytica
    - my example from July 12, 2024 on this page
    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&search_scope=UBS&tab=UBS&docid=alma9972771758805504&lang=en&context=L
    $gNo. 8 (2023) $gyr: 2023 $gno: 8

    Add the first $g in front of the title of the child entry:
    No. 8 (2023) Fashion

    Use the more normalized $g subfields for sorting

    - Alice Robinson's example from April 2, 2022 in the older idea exchange entry
    https://uzb.swisscovery.slsp.ch/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UZB:UZB&docid=alma990047977300205508&lang=en&context=L

    - https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9955887260105504&context=L&vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&lang=en&search_scope=DiscoveryNetwork&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=DiscoveryNetwork&query=title,exact,Archaeological%20and%20anthropological%20sciences,AND&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9026403568595991092&mode=advanced&offset=0

    => If there is a $q, use that for sorting (but the first $g for display)
    Example
    $gVolume 12, Number 2 (2020), 60 $gyr:2020 $gno:12 $q12/2/2020/60

    ---

    800 when the parent title has an author in field 100
    - the Brecht example in post 1
    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&search_scope=UBS&tab=UBS&docid=alma993707790105504&lang=en&context=L&isFrbr=true
    - from an inquiry I got today:
    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&tab=UBS&docid=alma996830890105504&lang=en&context=L

    ---

    810 when the parent title has a corporate name as author in field 110
    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&tab=UBS&docid=alma9970764540105504&lang=en&context=L

    ---

    811 when the parent title has a congress name as author in field 111
    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&tab=UBS&docid=alma9972827070905504&lang=en&context=L

    ---

    830 when the parent title doesn't have a 1xx field. This is the most common case = Series
    Example https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&tab=UBS&docid=alma991036390105504&context=L

    ---

    From the older thread (https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/42926031-number-and-sort-the-volumes-in-multi-volume-works), posted May 28, 2024:

    CNMARC field 200 subfield $h

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    Here's another exmple
    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&search_scope=UBS&tab=UBS&docid=alma9972771758805504&lang=en&context=L

    How it looks:

    Related titles
    Units : Construction
    Units : Decoration
    Units : Fashion
    Units : Interiors
    Units : Resources
    Units : The plant-based issue

    [as long as it's alphabetical, "The" should not be used for sorting]

    How it should look:

    No. 4 (2021) The plant-based issue
    No. 5 (2021) Decoration
    No. 6 (2022) Resources
    No. 7 (2022) Construction
    No. 8 (2023) Fashion
    No. 9 (2023) Interiors

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu_Schwendener commented  · 

    NERS 8869, open for voting now.

    Rephrased for better understanding:

    Related titles in Primo VE bib display: sort by enumeration

    When records have bib-to-bib relationships via 76X-78X and 8XX, the list of related titles is displayed in the Details section of the series/host record. The list is currently sorted alphabetically by the title of the related bib.
    Instead, we would like to be able to configure Alma so that Related Titles are sorted logically by sequence or volume.

    For example, the current display is:
    Analyzed Title A vol. 3
    Analyzed Title B vol. 1
    Analyzed Title C vol. 2.

    We would like this sorted by volume instead:
    Analyzed Title B vol. 1
    Analyzed Title C vol. 2
    Analyzed Title A vol. 3

    When related via field 773, titles should be sorted by $q (enumeration).
    For all other related fields 76X-78X, titles should be sorted by $g (related parts).
    8XX fields should be sorted by $v (volume/sequence).

    How it looks at the moment:
    https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&search_scope=UBS&tab=UBS&docid=alma993707790105504&lang=en&context=L

    How it should be looking:
    https://www.suhrkamp.de/werkausgabe/bertolt-brecht-werke-grosse-kommentierte-berliner-und-frankfurter-ausgabe-30-baende-in-32-teilbaenden-und-ein-registerband-leinen-w-17

    Manu_Schwendener supported this idea  · 
  20. 114 votes
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8

Feedback and Knowledge Base