It would be useful if item policy could be configured as a field to display in either the brief or full item display. Currently, the loanable indicator is defined by the fulfillment terms of use, which is dependent on users signing in in order for Primo to calculate the loan policy specifically for that user.

Having the option to display the item policy from Alma as a field in Primo would be beneficial as this does not change dependent on the user type or fulfillment rules. It would also provide more information to users irrespective of whether they are able to sign into Primo (e.g. users not affiliated to the institution will be unable to sign in) and makes it clearer and easier for staff to explain to customers why a particular item can/cannot be borrowed.

Primo VE is configured to map 6XX $v form subdivisions to a separate display field, breaking the subject string. In some cases, the form subdivision is plucked out of the 6XX, leaving the surrounding string incomplete. For example:

600 10 $aO'Keeffe, Georgia, $d1887-1986 $vExhibitions
displays in Primo VE as:

Subject O'Keeffe, Georgia, 1887-1986

Genre Exhibitions

651 #0 $aRome (Italy) $vMaps $vEarly works to 1800
displays in Primo VE as:

Subject Rome (Italy)

Genre Maps

                   Early works to 1800

And so on, for all 6XX $v form subdivisions. This cannot be reconfigured. Additionally, each occurrence of the form subdivision is displayed as a separate genre. An exhibition catalog with three artists appearing in 6XX fields would result in three genre term displays, all saying "Exhibitions".

To preserve our subject string with form subdivisions intact, we were advised to consider adding a 9XX with the field as we want it to display and labeling that as Subject in Primo VE.This adds steps to cataloger workflow and generates unnecessary data in the records.

This display feature should be reconsidered. Whether or not to split $v form subdivisions should at least be configurable by libraries.

When our users look for a book in the Primo Search Portal they expect that the Primo Search behaves like a Google Search, i.e. they expect that Primo finds books with titles or metadata containing words similar to those in their query. Unfortunately, the Primo Search is very sensitive to the exact spelling of the words in the query. If the search query is slightly inaccurate, the book is not found in Primo. I tried such unsuccessful search queries on www.amazon.de, and Amazon usually found the correct book: Amazon showed the correct hit on top of the list (see attachment). This shows that the search algorithms of Amazon are clearly superior to those of Primo. I feel that Ex Libris should take steps to keep up with modern search technologies.
Some, but not all, of Primo’s shortcomings seem rather easy to fix. Primo fails to take word flexions in non-English languages into account. Since the endings of German words not only depend on plural and singular but also on the context, Primo’s search results for German queries are overly sensitive to word flexions. However, some of the English examples indicate that improving Primo’s dictionaries will not be sufficient. Over the long term, ExLibris may consider to team up with a specialized search provider.

Similar proposals in ExLibris idea exchange
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/37586617-increase-primo-search-capability-to-support-major
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/564566-summon/suggestions/17415091-automatically-searching-for-the-corrected-spelling

In the brief and full display pages, libraries can display information contained in data fields (such as the title, author, and creation date) from the source record. This information helps users to differentiate records quickly. In some cases, there can be a lot of information that is displayed. This is particularly the case when Contributor is added: all 7XX fields are added, and in their entirety (see for example in the attached screenshot).

We would like an option that would allow the library to either limit the number of fields to display (for example max 3 7XX fields) or to only display fields based on the content of some subfields (for example: only display 7XX where $$e equals 'editor', 'publishing director ', 'translator', 'Director', 'film director'...).

Create Discovery Manager roles and give customers the possibility to assign Discovery roles to colleagues who are in charge of specific content updates in the front end (notably Tag management, Resource Recommender management, Primo Central Index activations/deactivations) and who are not necessarily Primo administrators. For more flexibility and granularity, different roles (or parameters to add?) should be created. For example, a staff user in charge of Resource Recommender management should not necessarily have access to PCI activations.

Subject and reference librarians could directly work in Alma in order to keep recommended resources, tags and PCI collections updated; tasks where traditional Primo administrator skills are not required. Currently, a single 'Discovery – Admin’ role concentrates too many responsibilities and functionalities.

Hi
We're in a consortium, using Primo VE.

Our first two search scope slots are
– IZ
– NZ plus CDI

It is possible to show a facet 'Other libraries', which shows the libraries outside our own IZ.

But 'Other libraries' can't be customized like a normal facet:
– it can't be displayed only in the search scope slot NZ/CDI without being displayed in the search scope slot IZ
– it can't be separated from the facet Libraries and for example put last in the list of facets
– it can't be collapsed if the facet Libraries is not collapsed

Showing libraries from outside our IZ in the search scope slot "IZ" is too confusing.

So for the moment we are hiding 'Other libraries' altogether. But we would like to show it in the search scope slot "NZ/CDI".

https://basel.swisscovery.org

When filtering to a certain location via facets, you often get results from other locations too, which is unexpected from patrons perspective in many cases. This is caused by the current related records setting which is also taking locations with related records into account. The display is correct for analytical records without inventory (book chapters and articles), but not for the other monographical resources.

What we wish to achieve is the following:

> When the record of a book chapter, journal issue or journal article (i.e. a record containing a 773 field with $w) is viewed in Primo, the holding of the record linked via 773 $w is displayed.

> When records contain a series link (8xx $w) or a related record (76x/77x/78x $w - exception: 773), we do wish to display a link to the related record (via system number), but not the related holding.

Right now, the configuration does not offer the needed flexibility.

In the current context of global health crisis and containment, many of our libraries can only offer Click&Collect service for physical documentation access. Then, it seems critical to make the request service evolve in Primo (and Alma for the tracking).
Indeed, a reader who wants to request several documents must do so one by one from the bibliographic record by selecting the "pickup location", possibly a "start date", an "end date" and a "comment".
Couldn't you consider the possibility of creating a basket and then being able to request the entire basket at once?
Thanks

This new demand could also help to resolve this existing demand:
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/35709595-option-to-request-multiple-volumes

In Primo VE, only one of “vocabulary” is available - “Library of Congress Subject Headings.” The choice to use this “vocabulary” is automatically made for you when you choose “Browse by Library of Congress Subject.” The index “Library of Congress name authority records for 651” is not available through this search as it is through the Metadata Editor via Alma. Thus, many, many LC subject headings cannot actually be browsed in Primo VE. Example, you can find NO headings beginning with “Colombia – Commerce,” because there is no LC subject authority for “Colombia – Commerce” or for any further subdivision of that heading. You CANNOT find the heading “Colombia – Commerce – History” by browse in Primo. Browse by subject gives incomplete results - nearly half the records are not discoverable using this method. Many researchers use this method to find their materials.