Manu Schwendener
My feedback
258 results found
-
184 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
2 votes
-
58 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Removing / adding titles in a set from/to a collection is possible (by now), at least for display in Primo VE.
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
38 votes
Thank you for this idea, we are reviewing the details at this time.
An error occurred while saving the comment > Blank ILL Form
Which means it's not Rapido related and should be moved to RapidILL?
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/935109-rapidillor to Alma?
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-almaAn error occurred while saving the comment Hi Maria
This must be a setting somewhere: it does not happen in our Rapido.
(https://basel.swisscovery.org, but you can't check without a login)
Open a support case with Ex Libris?
-
45 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Feels more like a bug report than a feature request to me.
-
109 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment I agree that links should open in the active window, unless the user decides otherwise
-
435 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS 8266, open for voting now.
An error occurred while saving the comment > I would prefer that users have the ability to "show more" facets until they
> have seen all possible values in the data.I very much agree.
An error occurred while saving the comment Did not make it through round 2 of NERS 2022.
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS 7888, open for voting now
An error occurred while saving the comment Alphabetical sort will not be fully possible as long as only 50 facets can be displayed.
An error occurred while saving the comment [for those who can vote in NERS: 6414]
-
119 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Does somebody have examples of sites which do this well? Could you post URLs and maybe screenshots?
An error occurred while saving the comment Change background of the exclude icon (thank you, FF):
.available-facets .section-content .md-chips .md-chip .md-button:before
{background-color: #fff; }----
If somebody knows how to right align the icons, please let me know.
An error occurred while saving the comment Change border colour of the include check box:
md-checkbox .md-icon {
border-color: #DDD !important ;
}---
Change background colour of 'Apply Filters':
.multiselect-submit .multiselect-submit-inner .md-button.md-primary, .prm-positive-bg {
background-color: #008488;
}.multiselect-submit:hover .multiselect-submit-inner:hover .md-button.md-primary:hover, .prm-positive-bg:hover {
background-color: #A5D7D2;
}
---Change the colour of the exclude icon:
.available-facets .section-content .md-chips .md-chip .button-exclude {
color: #ECECEC;
}---
Thank you, JC!
An error occurred while saving the comment Thank you, Nancy!
An error occurred while saving the comment swisscollections.ch has an elegant solution
(Not Primo / Primo VE)
An error occurred while saving the comment I see that Buffalo has made the first of the steps by making include static:
https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/search?query=any,contains,discovery&tab=LibraryCatalog&search_scope=MyInstitution&vid=01SUNY_BUF:catalog&offset=0
(Primo VE)---
And as Anne mentioned, Washington shows both include and exclude (Primo)
https://alliance-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?search_scope=all&tab=default_tab&institution=01ALLIANCE_UW&vid=UW&displayMode=full&bulkSize=10&highlight=true&dum=true&pcAvailabiltyMode=true&query=any,contains,facets&displayField=all&queryTemp=facetsAn error occurred while saving the comment There's another problem with the UX as it is at the moment:
When you do an OR selection by putting a checkmark left to several facets at once, this only works correctly for facets within the same facet type.
If you combine facets from different types, the search that is done is AND, not OR.An error occurred while saving the comment "making the filter options static - including the persistent (lock) option- would go a long way to improving the usability of facets for users."
This is also true in Primo VE.
An error occurred while saving the comment [Keren is right in her reply]
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment > We expect that records suppressed from discovery should be suppressed everywhere
I agree
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment I don't agree with the option to show the path in Primo, but hide the collection in the collection interface. This would be inconsistent and confusing.
> to give a results list for students of all items in the collection
I wouldn't mind if there was an option in Alma to distinguish between 'published collection' (= as they are now), and unpublished (= not the same as suppressed): unpublished would mean you get an URL via Alma that you can share.
If you don't want to wait for that, you could work with local fields instead.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Also please deactivate FRBR after any advanced search - or at least make it an option for the patron to deactivate:
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment > addition of a visibility checkbox or toggle
What certainly is missing is the option to toggle visible / invisible from the Manage Collections page!
And come to think of it, I wouldn't really mind if collections that are not visible in Primo (= not in the collection lobby and not showing the path in the details) could still be shown via a direct link.
It would be the same as 'unpublished' in other contexts (for example photo sharing sites): not findable, but everybody who knows the direct link can see the collection.
An error occurred while saving the comment > welcome any other workarounds
If you want, maybe also post in the Primo mailing group if others had a similar situation and how they solved it.
(Sorry if you already did this and I forgot.)
An error occurred while saving the comment While I understand your wish, I have the feeling that this would be confusing for the patrons, because it would be inconsistent.
"Why am I seeing the path in the full record display, but can not find it via the collections page?"
I see two workarounds that would be less confusing, and exist already:
A) for your second case, use local fields instead of collections
B) for your second case, use an additional level in the collections. Call the top level something short (like 'others'?), in the description of the top level collection explain what's behind it.
Like this, you keep the Collections Lobby tidy / only show what you want to show there, but the behaviour of the subcollections within "others" is still consistent. -
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I agree that it would help to have more flexibility here.
As a patron, I'd prefer if my previous pickup library could be preselected, though https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/44908411-define-preferred-pickup-location-in-personal-detai
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi
Can you post a link to an example in your catalog?
Thank you :-)
Bluesky's icon https://blueskyweb.xyz/blog/12-21-2023-butterfly