Manu Schwendener
My feedback
311 results found
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
2 votes
-
56 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Removing / adding titles in a set from/to a collection is possible (by now), at least for display in Primo VE.
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
35 votes
Thank you for this idea, we are reviewing the details at this time.
An error occurred while saving the comment > Blank ILL Form
Which means it's not Rapido related and should be moved to RapidILL?
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/935109-rapidillor to Alma?
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-almaAn error occurred while saving the comment Hi Maria
This must be a setting somewhere: it does not happen in our Rapido.
(https://basel.swisscovery.org, but you can't check without a login)
Open a support case with Ex Libris?
-
45 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Feels more like a bug report than a feature request to me.
-
106 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment I agree that links should open in the active window, unless the user decides otherwise
-
47 votes
Hello,
This is planned to be implemented in the new primo experience user interface.
Regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
432 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS 8266, open for voting now.
An error occurred while saving the comment > I would prefer that users have the ability to "show more" facets until they
> have seen all possible values in the data.I very much agree.
An error occurred while saving the comment Did not make it through round 2 of NERS 2022.
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS 7888, open for voting now
An error occurred while saving the comment Alphabetical sort will not be fully possible as long as only 50 facets can be displayed.
An error occurred while saving the comment [for those who can vote in NERS: 6414]
-
126 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Does somebody have examples of sites which do this well? Could you post URLs and maybe screenshots?
An error occurred while saving the comment Change background of the exclude icon (thank you, FF):
.available-facets .section-content .md-chips .md-chip .md-button:before
{background-color: #fff; }----
If somebody knows how to right align the icons, please let me know.
An error occurred while saving the comment Change border colour of the include check box:
md-checkbox .md-icon {
border-color: #DDD !important ;
}---
Change background colour of 'Apply Filters':
.multiselect-submit .multiselect-submit-inner .md-button.md-primary, .prm-positive-bg {
background-color: #008488;
}.multiselect-submit:hover .multiselect-submit-inner:hover .md-button.md-primary:hover, .prm-positive-bg:hover {
background-color: #A5D7D2;
}
---Change the colour of the exclude icon:
.available-facets .section-content .md-chips .md-chip .button-exclude {
color: #ECECEC;
}---
Thank you, JC!
An error occurred while saving the comment Thank you, Nancy!
An error occurred while saving the comment swisscollections.ch has an elegant solution
(Not Primo / Primo VE)
An error occurred while saving the comment I see that Buffalo has made the first of the steps by making include static:
https://search.lib.buffalo.edu/discovery/search?query=any,contains,discovery&tab=LibraryCatalog&search_scope=MyInstitution&vid=01SUNY_BUF:catalog&offset=0
(Primo VE)---
And as Anne mentioned, Washington shows both include and exclude (Primo)
https://alliance-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?search_scope=all&tab=default_tab&institution=01ALLIANCE_UW&vid=UW&displayMode=full&bulkSize=10&highlight=true&dum=true&pcAvailabiltyMode=true&query=any,contains,facets&displayField=all&queryTemp=facetsAn error occurred while saving the comment There's another problem with the UX as it is at the moment:
When you do an OR selection by putting a checkmark left to several facets at once, this only works correctly for facets within the same facet type.
If you combine facets from different types, the search that is done is AND, not OR.An error occurred while saving the comment "making the filter options static - including the persistent (lock) option- would go a long way to improving the usability of facets for users."
This is also true in Primo VE.
An error occurred while saving the comment [Keren is right in her reply]
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment > We expect that records suppressed from discovery should be suppressed everywhere
I agree
-
119 votes
Thank you for posting this idea. We are considering to have a new toggle
""group versions together" where users can choose to if to have search results grouped by versions or turn it off.
An error occurred while saving the comment Can't wait for this to get solved! :-)
Do you have any idea when this will happen?
An error occurred while saving the comment Please make the state of the toggle part of the URL, so that we can use it to send precise links and for deep linking.
Thank you :-)
An error occurred while saving the comment Thank you, Nili, I'm really glad to hear this.
An error occurred while saving the comment An easy way to achieve this would be:
In advanced search, let the patrons decide before the search (with checkmarks) if they want FRBR and deduplication on or off in the result list.
An error occurred while saving the comment Seeing that with the August 2023 release, FRBR and deduplication will be deactivated in browse search, gives me hope.
The same should be possible for advanced search.
Ideally with parameters:
- setting per view
- separate settings for FRBR and deduplication
- library decides default
- patrons can override the default settings in their accountAn error occurred while saving the comment > having experienced quite a lot of difficulties both with DeDup and FRBR ...
I agree, also Deduplication on/off should be a setting the patrons can decide.
An error occurred while saving the comment While I still think
- after advanced search, FRBR should always be deactivated
- the patrons should be able to switch FRBR offthe biggest part of the problem is solved in Primo VE with 'equals exact phrase', since May 2023.
An error occurred while saving the comment > patron would mistakenly believe that only one match exists
Yes, this is why FRBR Preferred is not the solution.
----
Thank you for the example, Nancy!
> If the FRBR settings could be easy user-controlled toggles (like "Expand My
> Results" and "Search in Full Text", this would be a great solution.Yes. The order of those three should be customizable, and the setting for FRBR on/off should be done with the same flexibility as "Search in full text" (which comes with the May 2022 release).
Ideally, the settings could also be saved as preferences in the patron's account, but that could come later.
An error occurred while saving the comment In the meantime I learned from Nili Natan that (in Primo VE) the setting
FRBR Preferred
is more practical for the patrons than
FRBR GenericIt allows them to get to the title they are looking for with only a few clicks, with just the _option_ to see the whole FRBR group.
Edit: this is a workaround. The real problem is that with Generic, in the resulting list of FRBR versions, the HIGHEST RANKED record from the results set is NOT shown as the first title.
---
The wish that the patrons should be able to deactivate FRBR and that FRBR should be deactivated after any Advanced search still stands.
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS 7227, open for voting now.
An error occurred while saving the comment > I wonder how to ... name
For FRBR I think "Turn off grouping" would be understandable.
-
154 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment This is the clumsy workaround we have at the moment to try and get our patrons to add their email address so we can get back to them.
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS 8185, open for voting now.
An error occurred while saving the comment @ExLibris: While you're working on it: sending an email via the email icon should trigger a confirmation message.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Yes, this is important. We need to know the patron's email address to be able to reply.
Patrons do not understand why nobody replies to their emails, because they have no way of knowing that we don't see who sent them.– For logged in patrons, use their email address as sender.
– When patrons are not logged in, let them send the email, but force them to fill in a 'sender email' field
-
468 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Seems to be planned for May 2024 (info via the DACHELA mailing list)
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment I don't agree with the option to show the path in Primo, but hide the collection in the collection interface. This would be inconsistent and confusing.
> to give a results list for students of all items in the collection
I wouldn't mind if there was an option in Alma to distinguish between 'published collection' (= as they are now), and unpublished (= not the same as suppressed): unpublished would mean you get an URL via Alma that you can share.
If you don't want to wait for that, you could work with local fields instead.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Also please deactivate FRBR after any advanced search - or at least make it an option for the patron to deactivate:
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
Bluesky's icon https://blueskyweb.xyz/blog/12-21-2023-butterfly