Please make the MARC bib. 245 subfield p from the bibliographic record available.
The MARC 245 subfield p from the bibliographic record is not exposed to Primo. This means that the data in the b245p is not available to display to users in the My Account section of Primo, as part of the requesting process and on pull slips for items. This becomes important when the items have 245a data that is the same. For example, when a video game has the same name with more info in the 245p like the ones below.
b245a b245p
Angry birds. Star Wars
Angry birds. Trilogy
Assassin's creed. Brotherhood
Assassin's creed. Revelations
Batman. Arkham Asylum
Batman. Arkham city
Batman. Arkham origins
Call of duty. Black Ops
Call of duty. Black ops II
I would like to see the bib. 245 p added.
examples of issues attached.
-
Nancy Babb commented
Proposals https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176/suggestions/15668418 and https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176/suggestions/15668475 are duplicates, with additional attached examples on 15668418. Could they be merged to combine votes?
-
Neecee commented
This would save our pages so much time!
-
Anonymous commented
Why are these subfields not already included???
-
Laura Akerman commented
Ah, that is a problem! Sorry I missed looking at the attachment.
-
Bryan commented
Please take a look at the Word document as it provides examples that will clarify what I am asking. The normal display is fine, but the listings in My Account and on pull slips are missing data that is necessary to see what the actual item is. The best examples are video games like these
b245a b245p
Angry birds. Star Wars
Angry birds. TrilogyThey would only display as Angry birds in My Account and in pull slips. That is not enough info. for someone to pull them from the shelf or for a user to which of the three Angry Birds titles are which in My Account.
B.
-
Laura Akerman commented
I don't understand this request - can't you just add the subfield p to your normalization rules for diplay/title? It seems to be in the ALMA MARC template for Primo so I'm assuming you lack it because your rules have been around awhile and don't have it.
Our subfield p's are displaying - including in the e-shelf. Here's an example:
http://discovere.emory.edu/discovere:default_scope:01EMORY_ALMA21159316240002486
This shouldn't need to be an enhancement.