Laura Akerman

My feedback

  1. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  2. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  3. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 
  4. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Agree with Steve McDonald. A job to match and convert LCSH in 655 to LCGFT if desired by the customer and if an appropriate match can be found, would need to change the vocabulary indications - this could be a desirable enhancement, but the current behavior is a bug. Keeping the vocabularies straight is crucial as we look toward linked data conversion

  5. 13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Marcus,

    What about the Client Common Titles.txt file? Could you use that? (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/Technical_Guide/180Files_Used_by_the_Dedup_Algorithm#ClientCommonTitles.txt all the way at the bottom)

    All the way at the bottom.

    Unfortunately, apparently it's accessed by the Serials matching profile only -- there's no corresponding file for monographs.

    Laura

  6. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 
  7. 66 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisitions  ·  Admin →
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  8. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  9. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  10. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Oops, I'm out of votes but let me lend support for this.

    I'd like it to be something we could handle in normalization rules and something we could control on the individual record basis if need be.

    We did all kinds of extremely time-wasting workarounds to get, for example, our print serial records to come out on tip of the skimpy SFX serial records (basically, by adding 856's to them so they would become "electronic").

    Now that we're no longer using SFX, and Alma Community Zone records are "better" for the most part, we still occasionally see dedups where the choice of preferred record is unfortunate. Nothing we can do....

    I could swear that at one time, I saw a configuration for choice of preferred record for dedups... in some odd place like the General Configuration maybe... but I can't find it now.

  11. 99 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Ah, that is a problem! Sorry I missed looking at the attachment.

    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    I don't understand this request - can't you just add the subfield p to your normalization rules for diplay/title? It seems to be in the ALMA MARC template for Primo so I'm assuming you lack it because your rules have been around awhile and don't have it.
    Our subfield p's are displaying - including in the e-shelf. Here's an example:
    http://discovere.emory.edu/discovere:default_scope:01EMORY_ALMA21159316240002486
    This shouldn't need to be an enhancement.

  12. 198 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  13. 29 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 
  14. 76 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  15. 144 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  16. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  17. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  18. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 
  19. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 
  20. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    I see this is also a NERS enhancement. Don't remember adding it there, but hope it can get some notice. We had another mysterious batch of 8 errors today - this time, the load was so small that the pipe errored out. But I wonder how many more like this have been happening. Hopefully we can diagnose the problem on the Alma end soon.

    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base