Skip to content

Laura Akerman

My feedback

20 results found

  1. 50 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  2. 42 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  3. 49 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    This is available in Primo publishing; it should be available for all other kinds of publishing for other purposes, not just OAI publishing

  4. 145 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  5. 753 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  6. 47 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  7. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  8. 45 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  9. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 
  10. 39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  11. 32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 
  12. 61 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Agree with Steve McDonald. A job to match and convert LCSH in 655 to LCGFT if desired by the customer and if an appropriate match can be found, would need to change the vocabulary indications - this could be a desirable enhancement, but the current behavior is a bug. Keeping the vocabularies straight is crucial as we look toward linked data conversion

  13. 83 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  14. 28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  15. 78 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Oops, I'm out of votes but let me lend support for this.

    I'd like it to be something we could handle in normalization rules and something we could control on the individual record basis if need be.

    We did all kinds of extremely time-wasting workarounds to get, for example, our print serial records to come out on tip of the skimpy SFX serial records (basically, by adding 856's to them so they would become "electronic").

    Now that we're no longer using SFX, and Alma Community Zone records are "better" for the most part, we still occasionally see dedups where the choice of preferred record is unfortunate. Nothing we can do....

    I could swear that at one time, I saw a configuration for choice of preferred record for dedups... in some odd place like the General Configuration maybe... but I can't find it now.

  16. 118 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Ah, that is a problem! Sorry I missed looking at the attachment.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    I don't understand this request - can't you just add the subfield p to your normalization rules for diplay/title? It seems to be in the ALMA MARC template for Primo so I'm assuming you lack it because your rules have been around awhile and don't have it.
    Our subfield p's are displaying - including in the e-shelf. Here's an example:
    http://discovere.emory.edu/discovere:default_scope:01EMORY_ALMA21159316240002486
    This shouldn't need to be an enhancement.

  17. 205 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  18. 80 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi all,

    This is to update that this is currently not planned to be developed. We might evaluate it again in the future.

    Therefore we are removing the "Under review" status for now.


    Best regards,

    Yael.

    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  19. 37 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
  20. 21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base