Skip to content

Laura Akerman

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

19 results found

  1. Enable person entity functionality at the view level

    58 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  2. Allow edits to POL Bib Descriptions on Cancelled POLs

    42 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  3. Add Electronic Collection Information to the Bib Record Enrichment Fields in the OAI Publishing Profile

    49 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Electronic  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    This is available in Primo publishing; it should be available for all other kinds of publishing for other purposes, not just OAI publishing

  4. Active Links in Journal Record when Searching in Journals

    145 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    16 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  5. Preventing Change of Due Date (Recall) when placing Physical Item Request

    47 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  6. Allow patron to choose whether to recall or just place a hold

    24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - Requests  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  7. Always add newly implemented fields to API and Analytics

    45 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  8. Bound-withs - use subfield $i bound with in tag 773 or 774 to separate binding from bibliographic relationships

    19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 

  9. Fix $g in 773 / 774 related records

    39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  10. Dedup and FRBR cluster monitoring

    32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman shared this idea  · 

  11. Preferred term correction - correct coding when flipping LCSH to LCGFT

    61 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Metadata Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Agree with Steve McDonald. A job to match and convert LCSH in 655 to LCGFT if desired by the customer and if an appropriate match can be found, would need to change the vocabulary indications - this could be a desirable enhancement, but the current behavior is a bug. Keeping the vocabularies straight is crucial as we look toward linked data conversion

  12. Ability to edit a location instead of creating a new one

    84 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisitions - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  13. File differences included with Release Notes

    28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  14. Make configurable preference of source in deduplication

    77 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Oops, I'm out of votes but let me lend support for this.

    I'd like it to be something we could handle in normalization rules and something we could control on the individual record basis if need be.

    We did all kinds of extremely time-wasting workarounds to get, for example, our print serial records to come out on tip of the skimpy SFX serial records (basically, by adding 856's to them so they would become "electronic").

    Now that we're no longer using SFX, and Alma Community Zone records are "better" for the most part, we still occasionally see dedups where the choice of preferred record is unfortunate. Nothing we can do....

    I could swear that at one time, I saw a configuration for choice of preferred record for dedups... in some odd place like the General Configuration maybe... but I can't find it now.

  15. Please make the MARC bib. 245 subfield p from the bibliographic record available.

    115 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    Ah, that is a problem! Sorry I missed looking at the attachment.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Laura Akerman commented  · 

    I don't understand this request - can't you just add the subfield p to your normalization rules for diplay/title? It seems to be in the ALMA MARC template for Primo so I'm assuming you lack it because your rules have been around awhile and don't have it.
    Our subfield p's are displaying - including in the e-shelf. Here's an example:
    http://discovere.emory.edu/discovere:default_scope:01EMORY_ALMA21159316240002486
    This shouldn't need to be an enhancement.

  16. Allow for consistant customizations in the new UI

    205 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Integration with other systems  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  17. • Records without a date at the bottom of results list when sorting on date oldest

    80 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Integration with other systems  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    AdminYael (yael.shahar@clarivate.com, Ex Libris) responded

    Hi all,

    This is to update that this is currently not planned to be developed. We might evaluate it again in the future.

    Therefore we are removing the "Under review" status for now.


    Best regards,

    Yael.

    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  18. alerts based on a range of call numbers

    37 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

  19. JavaScript in the Alma Resolver Menu (GetIt/ViewIt)

    21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Laura Akerman supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)