Julio M.
My feedback
25 results found
-
248 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
49 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
256 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
314 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
8 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
53 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
235 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
103 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
80 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
5 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
17 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
2 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
19 votesJulio M. shared this idea ·
-
49 votesJulio M. shared this idea ·
-
35 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Julio M. supported this idea · -
33 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Julio M. commented+1
Julio M. supported this idea · -
94 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
-
73 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Julio M. commentedDear Moshe,
using resource types as a criteria for determining the display of the form for Resource Sharing Requests does not allow it to be hidden from records with e-resources. For example, we can indicate that the form is only displayed under the resource type "Book", but this does not prevent it from being displayed in e-books. To solve this, you propose to make use of the General Electronic Services together with the display rules, but as you know, the OpenURL parameters that allow us to determine in which resources the GES will appear does not guarantee that it will be displayed in all e-resources to prevent the user from seeing the RSR form in those cases.
Best regards
-
15 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Julio M. commentedThis would be very useful and I think it is an idea to consider. Even if it doesn't get many votes now, it is important to put it on the record as an idea.
-
98 votesJulio M. supported this idea ·
+1