Joe Montibello
My feedback
19 results found
-
133 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
78 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Heidi Whitehead
Rialto Product Manager
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
30 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
33 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
49 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Joe Montibello commented
This is completely necessary. (having an import button on a page like this - which already has an export button - would allow libraries to readily update the whole table and be another solution to this problem.)
-
33 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Joe Montibello commented
This should be simple to achieve - just add a parameter to the Citation Material Types Code table that allows us to set each type as belonging in the "most common" section or not. We have several material types that we'd like to add in that section.
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Joe Montibello commented
This feels more like a bug than an enhancement request. I hope it can get enough attention to get it fixed.
-
58 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Joe Montibello commented
Out of votes but I like this one - we have code that can detect some duplicate user records, and being able to act on them via API would be great!
-
19 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
139 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
318 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
79 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
76 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
167 votes
Hi,
This is to update that this issue is still not planned to be developed in the current road map. We will continue to evaluate it for a future release.
Therefore we are keeping this under "Under review" status.
Best regards,
Yael.
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
107 votes
Joe Montibello supported this idea ·
-
32 votes
Joe Montibello shared this idea ·
This would be EXCEPTIONALLY useful to us! we have no way of tracking these changes otherwise.