Clara Lunndal
My feedback
23 results found
-
266 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for raising this idea.
This was part of the CERV cycle in 2025, but did not make it to the final list.
During the analysis, 3 possible approaches were discussed, each has a different estimation and effort:
Option 1: New dedicated process type
- It will be possible to mark specific items as "unavailable", similarly to the way it is possible to mark them as "missing"
- Items marked as "unavailable" will be considered as "not in place"
- The new "unavailable" option will appear as a possible process type in all the places where there is a list of process types, including configuration options such as Fulfillment Unit Rules
Option 2: Mark a location as "unavailable"
- It will be possible to mark a location as "unavailable"
- All items in this location will be considered as "not in place"
- The difference from option 1 is that when an item…
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
322 votes
This idea is currently under review for future enhancement.
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
143 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
204 votes
AdminAdina Marciano
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Thank you for the suggested idea. We see its value and will consider it in the future. This development requires integration with third-party providers, and we will need to investigate the possibility of this development.
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
88 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
121 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
328 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
441 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
173 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
194 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
60 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
Changing the status back from Accepted. Please continue to vote on the idea as your votes will help us prioritize the development. Thank you.
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
75 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
74 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
76 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
261 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
112 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
168 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
-
308 votes
Clara Lunndal
supported this idea
·
This must then be an option that one could opt out of - it would cause trouble in our quality control process if this was mandatory.