Peta Hopkins
My feedback
129 results found
-
49 votes
-
22 votes
-
0 votes
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Is this still the case for CDI records?
-
81 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1 (no votes left)
-
137 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I'd like to see this functionality extended to batch submission of resource sharing requests too. So important for researchers/higher degree research students who are submitting many requests.
It would need some thinking through that the type of request that should be created in Alma would depend on whether it is determined to be a hold request or digital copy request or physical resource sharing request. Quite complex.
-
230 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment No votes. But I support more flexibility with jobs.
-
5 votes
-
226 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that we are planning to develop this option in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface planning can be found here -
Best regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi @Nili - is there an update on this? Just wondering given the amount of support for it, and that NERS submissions are open. I don't want to submit a NERS request if it is already in the pipeline.
An error occurred while saving the comment It would be helpful to direct them to this when they submit requests for things that we have already supplied to them.
-
202 votes
We will add a field to the course record in Alma, reportable in Analytics, for the faculty/school. It could be used for reporting purposes but not for discovery purposes. In other words, you will be able to pull list usage by faculty/school, but end users will not be able to browse by faculty/school.
An error occurred while saving the comment I see this was going to be added to the roadmap back in Dec 2018. An update on this would be great.
-
5 votes
We plan to add the following options for the new UI:
Advanced search:
1. Select from Contains, Contains exact phrase, Starts with
2. Search by DOI
3. Type and Availability filters on the Advanced search page
4. Filter by publication date: Specific year, Last 2 years, Last 5 years, etc.
Search results:
5. Select multiple filters for type or availability with OR operator between. Example, Book or Book chapter
An error occurred while saving the comment This was set to Accepted in 2020. It would be great to have an update on where this is at, which search features have/are being included.
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS request 7689 for enhanced advanced search has been submitted for voting in 2022 - has some overlap with this idea.
-
171 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment There would be a need to account for user declaring that the request is within copyright limitations. Or someway to include a link in the rejection letter so that the user can then submit a resource sharing request and tick the © check box.
An error occurred while saving the comment Yes please. This would be really helpful to us. We cannot specify a publication date range for when a purchase request link should be shown instead of a resource sharing request. This would help us streamline the process for customers, if for whatever reason we are unable to purchase.
-
0 votes
-
48 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sounds like a very useful feature
-
70 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment We promoted Leganto as a way of avoiding inbox vortex, and so that our team could provide backup on any discussion if a Faculty Librarian was away. But if academics are not picking up and responding to the library discussions via Leganto then they slip back to using direct emails to their Faculty Librarians and the discussion is not accessible to the team to action items.
This idea might be part of the solution to making the discussion area more used. -
316 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment There goes my last Primo vote. Thanks for sharing this idea.
-
5 votes
-
75 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I support this. It would be so much easier to deal with punctuation
-
85 votes
At minimum the list selection options should work consistently with those in CiteIt too.