François Renaville
My feedback
35 results found
-
13 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
67 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
804 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment -
38 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
19 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
101 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
90 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
327 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
42 votes
Hi,
We would like to update that this idea is still not planned, but still being examined for a future release.
Best regards,
Yael.
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
87 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
74 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
51 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
150 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
-
179 votes
François Renaville supported this idea ·
Hi Tamar,
Here are 3 use cases and some examples where peer reviewed information should certainly not be displayed. I can only support Emmanuelle's last sentence in her request.
Best regards,
François
-------------------------------
(1) BOOK REVIEW ITEMS.
I would not flag book reviews as peer reviewed even if they have been published in a PR journal. Book review type should be excluded from PR information.
Examples:
Review of: The Chinese Cultural Revolution Data Base
Schoenhals, Michael
The China Quarterly, 2003 (175), p.837
cdi_swepub_primary_oai_lup_lub_lu_se_7233d02b_0380_4fbf_928d_6879a5f61143
Korea under Japanese rule: history of Hokuchin
Toshio, Sakai ; Caprio, Mark E
Journal of Korean studies, 2009, Vol.14 (1), p.117-117
cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1536009119
Book Reviews
Applications of Mathematics, 1974, Vol.19 (5), p.366-370
cdi_crossref_primary_10_21136_AM_1974_103551
Referate
Walter, H ; Kunter, M ; Bullerdiek, J
Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 1993, Vol.51 (3), p.287-288
cdi_schweizerbart_primary_10_1127_anthranz_51_1993_287
Zwischen Berlin und St Petersburg: Die österreichisch-ungarische Außenpolitik unter Gustav Graf Kálnoky, 1881-1895
Rauscher, Walter ; Cornwall, M
Slavonic and East European review, 1996, Vol.74 (2), p.318-319
cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38906182
A.J.E. HARMSEN, "Onderwys in de tooneel-poëzy. De opvattingen over toneel van het Kunstgenootschap Nil Volentibus Arduum" (diss. UvA). Rotterdam 1989 (Book Review)
Haas, A.S. de
Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde, 1992, Vol.108, p.83
cdi_proquest_journals_1791648603
Andrea Lupacchini -- La sensorialità dei materiali -- Franco Angeli, Milano, 2016 [book review]
Conti, Christina
Techne : Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 2018 (16), p.340-341
cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2172186496
(2) OLDER ITEMS
Since peer reviewing (as we know it now) has only been widely used since the middle of the 20th century? I find it a bit weird to indicated that articles from the 19th or early 20th centuries are peer reviewed. I would recommend Ex Libris to agree with the Content Working Group from which year a journal article could be flagged as peer reviewed or not.
Examples:
BEMERKUNGEN UEBER DIE ZUSTANDSGLEICHUNGEN DER ADSORBIERTEN PHASEN. II
Tamamushi, Bun-ichi
Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1928, Vol.3 (6), p.142-146
cdi_proquest_journals_1450989454
The Week in Review
Journal of education (Boston, Mass.), 1915, Vol.82 (5), p.114-116
cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_002205741508200501
Reviews of Books
LITTLE, A. G.
The English historical review, 1922, Vol.XXXVII (CXLV), p.116-119
cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ehr_XXXVII_CXLV_116
British Medical Journal
British Medical Journal, 1862, Vol.1 (65), p.337
cdi_bmj_primary_10_1136_bmj_1_65_337
Masthead
Astronomische Nachrichten, 1897, Vol.142 (23), p.fmi-fmi
cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_KNDMJDSV_P
SCIENTIFIC NOTES AND NEWS
M, W F
Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1898, Vol.7 (161), p.128
cdi_pubmed_primary_17798659
(3) LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
I think that letters to the editor(s) or replies to the editors should not be indicated as peer-reviewed either. Although those items are usually Articles in CDI, I understand they may be more complicate to isolate.
Examples:
letter to the editor
Assimon, Magdalene M. ; Pun, Patrick H. ; Wang, Lily ; Al-Khatib, Sana M. ; Brookhart, M. Alan ; Weber, David J. ; Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. ; Flythe, Jennifer E.
Kidney international, 2022, Vol.102 (5), p.1191-1192
cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_kint_2022_08_009
Letter to the editor
Zagarella, Samuel ; Bigby, Michael ; Sladden, Michael ; Popescu, Catalin
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2023, Vol.88 (1), p.e27
cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2019_03_061
Letter to the editor
Chen, Yonghao ; Wang, Chunhui
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2022, Vol.76 (2)
cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_hep_32459
Letter to the editor
Lester, Cathy C ; Wu, Shengde ; Naciff, Jorge ; Laufersweiler, Michael ; Daston, George
Toxicological sciences, 2022
cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfac111
Letter to the editor
Pluskiewicz, Wojciech ; Pietraszkiewicz, Franciszek
Osteoporosis international, 2022, Vol.33 (10), p.2229-2230
cdi_proquest_journals_2722602150
Reply to letter to the editor by Riquelme LF et al. entitled ‘IDDSI letter to the editor’
Rothenberg, Elisabet ; Bischoff, Stephan C. ; Thibault, Ronan
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022, Vol.41 (5), p.1142-1143
cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03659887v1