Skip to content

François Renaville

My feedback

34 results found

  1. 49 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  2. 770 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Hi Tamar,

    Here are 3 use cases and some examples where peer reviewed information should certainly not be displayed. I can only support Emmanuelle's last sentence in her request.

    Best regards,

    François

    -------------------------------

    (1) BOOK REVIEW ITEMS.
    I would not flag book reviews as peer reviewed even if they have been published in a PR journal. Book review type should be excluded from PR information.

    Examples:

    Review of: The Chinese Cultural Revolution Data Base
    Schoenhals, Michael
    The China Quarterly, 2003 (175), p.837
    cdi_swepub_primary_oai_lup_lub_lu_se_7233d02b_0380_4fbf_928d_6879a5f61143

    Korea under Japanese rule: history of Hokuchin
    Toshio, Sakai ; Caprio, Mark E
    Journal of Korean studies, 2009, Vol.14 (1), p.117-117
    cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1536009119

    Book Reviews
    Applications of Mathematics, 1974, Vol.19 (5), p.366-370
    cdi_crossref_primary_10_21136_AM_1974_103551

    Referate
    Walter, H ; Kunter, M ; Bullerdiek, J
    Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 1993, Vol.51 (3), p.287-288
    cdi_schweizerbart_primary_10_1127_anthranz_51_1993_287

    Zwischen Berlin und St Petersburg: Die österreichisch-ungarische Außenpolitik unter Gustav Graf Kálnoky, 1881-1895
    Rauscher, Walter ; Cornwall, M
    Slavonic and East European review, 1996, Vol.74 (2), p.318-319
    cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_38906182

    A.J.E. HARMSEN, "Onderwys in de tooneel-poëzy. De opvattingen over toneel van het Kunstgenootschap Nil Volentibus Arduum" (diss. UvA). Rotterdam 1989 (Book Review)
    Haas, A.S. de
    Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde, 1992, Vol.108, p.83
    cdi_proquest_journals_1791648603

    Andrea Lupacchini -- La sensorialità dei materiali -- Franco Angeli, Milano, 2016 [book review]
    Conti, Christina
    Techne : Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 2018 (16), p.340-341
    cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2172186496

    (2) OLDER ITEMS
    Since peer reviewing (as we know it now) has only been widely used since the middle of the 20th century? I find it a bit weird to indicated that articles from the 19th or early 20th centuries are peer reviewed. I would recommend Ex Libris to agree with the Content Working Group from which year a journal article could be flagged as peer reviewed or not.

    Examples:

    BEMERKUNGEN UEBER DIE ZUSTANDSGLEICHUNGEN DER ADSORBIERTEN PHASEN. II
    Tamamushi, Bun-ichi
    Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 1928, Vol.3 (6), p.142-146
    cdi_proquest_journals_1450989454

    The Week in Review
    Journal of education (Boston, Mass.), 1915, Vol.82 (5), p.114-116
    cdi_sage_journals_10_1177_002205741508200501

    Reviews of Books
    LITTLE, A. G.
    The English historical review, 1922, Vol.XXXVII (CXLV), p.116-119
    cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_ehr_XXXVII_CXLV_116

    British Medical Journal
    British Medical Journal, 1862, Vol.1 (65), p.337
    cdi_bmj_primary_10_1136_bmj_1_65_337

    Masthead
    Astronomische Nachrichten, 1897, Vol.142 (23), p.fmi-fmi
    cdi_istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_KNDMJDSV_P

    SCIENTIFIC NOTES AND NEWS
    M, W F
    Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1898, Vol.7 (161), p.128
    cdi_pubmed_primary_17798659

    (3) LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
    I think that letters to the editor(s) or replies to the editors should not be indicated as peer-reviewed either. Although those items are usually Articles in CDI, I understand they may be more complicate to isolate.

    Examples:

    letter to the editor
    Assimon, Magdalene M. ; Pun, Patrick H. ; Wang, Lily ; Al-Khatib, Sana M. ; Brookhart, M. Alan ; Weber, David J. ; Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. ; Flythe, Jennifer E.
    Kidney international, 2022, Vol.102 (5), p.1191-1192
    cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_kint_2022_08_009

    Letter to the editor
    Zagarella, Samuel ; Bigby, Michael ; Sladden, Michael ; Popescu, Catalin
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2023, Vol.88 (1), p.e27
    cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2019_03_061

    Letter to the editor
    Chen, Yonghao ; Wang, Chunhui
    Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2022, Vol.76 (2)
    cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_hep_32459

    Letter to the editor
    Lester, Cathy C ; Wu, Shengde ; Naciff, Jorge ; Laufersweiler, Michael ; Daston, George
    Toxicological sciences, 2022
    cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_toxsci_kfac111

    Letter to the editor
    Pluskiewicz, Wojciech ; Pietraszkiewicz, Franciszek
    Osteoporosis international, 2022, Vol.33 (10), p.2229-2230
    cdi_proquest_journals_2722602150

    Reply to letter to the editor by Riquelme LF et al. entitled ‘IDDSI letter to the editor’
    Rothenberg, Elisabet ; Bischoff, Stephan C. ; Thibault, Ronan
    Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022, Vol.41 (5), p.1142-1143
    cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03659887v1

  3. 313 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  4. 30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  5. 33 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  6. 31 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    François Renaville commented  · 

    +1

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  7. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  8. 172 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  9. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville shared this idea  · 
  10. 60 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    François Renaville commented  · 

    I forgot to update this idea, sorry. We noticed last summer that behavior had changed and that app users could go back to Primo PI search results in all circumstances. So, the known issue must have been fixed, although I must have missed the information. Thanks to all who supported the idea. ;-)

  11. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  12. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  13. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  14. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville shared this idea  · 
  15. 462 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    François Renaville commented  · 

    I agree that it is always painful when Discovery Import Profiles (Import Data to Primo VE) complete with errors because some harvested records failed to load. We must always open a case and provide the process ID, so that Support can tell us which records could not be imported. Of course, we rarely get an answer in the next fex days at Tier 1... If we could directly see in the job Report which records have failed, we could quickly fix the issue ourselves, either in correctling the source data (if they are ours) or by updating our normalization rules accordingly.

  16. 80 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  17. 62 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  18. 72 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  19. 310 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  20. 62 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    François Renaville commented  · 

    This would indeed be helpful! Thanks for submittig this idea!

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base