François Renaville
My feedback
38 results found
-
36 votes
-
172 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
16 votes
-
40 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Amy Copeland
Senior Product Manager
-
35 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Amy Copeland
Senior Product Manager
-
40 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Amy Copeland
Senior Product Manager
-
340 votes
This idea is currently under review for future enhancement.
An error occurred while saving the comment My institution would also be very interested in such a new feature. In our view, it is essential to ensure that this new index and facet apply not only to Alma data (MARC and DC), but also to external data sources and CDI records. We have submitted Aha request PENH-I-28434 (Create a dedicated Primo search index and facet for Publishers and Printers).
"Following feedback from end-users and reference librarians, we request the creation of a dedicated Primo search index and facet for publishers and printers, in order to enable proper discovery, exploitation, and highlighting of publisher- and printer-related metadata.
This enhancement is particularly important for the valorization of physical and digitized heritage collections, where publisher and printer information is a key access point for research, provenance studies, and collection analysis.
At present, publisher and printer data can only be retrieved through the "general" index, which is insufficient for targeted searching, browsing, and faceting. As a result, valuable metadata remains largely invisible and underexploited.
Scope of the Proposed Index:
The new Primo index should include the following data sources and fields:
1) All Alma fields and subfields currently included in the Alma "Publisher" index (260 b,f; 261 a,b,e; 262 b; 264 b ; 502 c ; and 533 c);
2) All MARC 1XX and 7XX fields associated with relation codes "pbl" (Publisher) or "prt" (Printer);
3) Values of the Dublin Core publisher field, for both Alma DC records and external data sources;
4) Publisher- and printer-related values in CDI records.Normalization and Faceting Rules:
Default normalization rules should be applied to this index and facet in order to:
- Neutralize non-relevant or purely formal elements in publisher names (e.g. corp., imprint, Ltd., Inc., etc.)
- Enable maximum clustering and grouping of variant forms of the same publisher or printer
- Improve facet usability, consistency, and relevance for end usersThis enhancement would significantly improve the discoverability and analytical value of publisher and printer metadata in Primo, especially for institutions managing rich historical and special collections."
-
117 votes
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I couldn't agree more, it's almost blindingly obvious. Thanks for posting this!
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Actually, the same logic could be applied across all products and solutions within the Ex Libris Higher-Ed cloud solutions ecosystem. So beside Primo VE/Primo NDE, Leganto, Esploro, Rialto, and Rapido could also be considered.
-
197 votes
-
128 votes
-
135 votes
-
127 votes
-
128 votes
-
16 votes
-
64 votes
-
51 votes
-
43 votes
-
101 votes
Could this new feature maybe be useful for Mastodon https://coywolf.com/news/social-media/mastodon-now-has-an-official-share-button-for-sites/ ?