Jill Hazard
My feedback
29 results found
-
67 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
135 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
210 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Jill Hazard
shared this idea
·
-
4 votes
Jill Hazard
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
Jill Hazard
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
Jill Hazard
shared this idea
·
-
6 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
143 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
115 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
101 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Jill Hazard
shared this idea
·
-
10 votes
Jill Hazard
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
Jill Hazard
shared this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment
Jill Hazard
commented
Forgot to include - not just place of publication but also author affiliations (e.g. uni or institute they may work at.)
Jill Hazard
shared this idea
·
-
167 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
Jill Hazard
supported this idea
·
Hi Stacey - in response, our current workaround is for local only - we have enabled it only appear when searching in local catalogue scopes so it's only available when it's only local records being searched - hence current limitation and enhancement suggestion as this limitation was seen as frustrating to our subject librarians. We also used reg ex to amalgamate US states to just be USA, Australian territories into just Australia, Canadian proviences to just Canada and countries in the UK to just UK to avoid flooding or facet with the specifics that weren't needed. - to be clear i would anticipate this idea to include that level of development to recognise and putt place of publication together into a country level. - again apologies for not making it clearer on the entry.