Anita Euving
My feedback
20 results found
-
87 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
95 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
130 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesAnita Euving
shared this idea
·
-
31 votes
AdminTami Ezra
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Removing the "accepted" status so that institution can continue voting as agreed with the PWG.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
82 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
76 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
211 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
88 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
128 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
204 votes
Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,
Thanks so much for sharing this idea!
From what I understand, it includes two main parts:
- Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
- Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.
Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.
If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks again,
Tamar
Anita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
68 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
53 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
181 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
107 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
325 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
100 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
-
50 votesAnita Euving
supported this idea
·
.png){kind=link}
We would love to have Accessibility Content (341 field, controlled) and Accessibility Note (532 field, free text) added to Alma and Alma Analytics as search options/criteria. It would be very helpful in identifying records that include (or do not include) these fields. Libraries need to be in compliance with the new WCAG 2.1 AA standards in 2026 or 2027. Even though accessible MARC fields are not included in the ruling, it would be a useful and helpful addition that will help our users, since the fields can also be used to create accessibility facets in Primo.