Anne Woje
My feedback
16 results found
-
204 votes
Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,
Thanks so much for sharing this idea!
From what I understand, it includes two main parts:
- Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
- Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.
Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.
If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks again,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
143 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
134 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
73 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
194 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
325 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
271 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anne Woje
commented
Strongly supported idea!
-
38 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
Changing the status back from Accepted. Please continue to vote on the idea as your votes will help us prioritize the development. Thank you.
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
60 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
81 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
Anne Woje
supported this idea
·
Elizabeth's request is very interesting and my e-resource team supports it. We would like to explore using the Vendor section to hold more of our e-resources administrative information.