Walter
My feedback
26 results found
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Walter supported this idea · -
121 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
79 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
39 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
44 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
104 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
217 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
29 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
169 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
109 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
357 votes
Additional 10 closed fee statuses will be mapped in a code table. Libraries will be able to change their description. Fees with any of these statuses will be considered closed for all purposes.
The same types will be used also for transaction types.
When an import from bursar is processed, each fee may optionally include a code of the status to which the fee will change.
-
214 votes
A check box will be available when selecting the 'restore' option to enable clearing out the temporary information fields.
-
109 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
101 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
317 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
103 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
89 votesWalter supported this idea ·
-
139 votes
Dear all,
This will be supported in the new UX of the title searches, that will be available for opt-in in the coming November release:
The holdings section in the record's details pane has a sorting option that allows the user to select a preferred sorting of the following options:
- Regular Alma ranking
- Alma ranking, with related holdings appearing last
- Alma ranking, with related holdings appearing first
This setting will be a user preference that is remembered by the system, and impact the sorting in both the holdings section and the expanded physical tab of the search results.
Walter supported this idea · -
744 votes
Hi all,
We would like to update that this is planned to be developed in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface plans can be found here -
Therefore we are changing the status of this idea to "Planned".
Best regards,
Yael.
Walter supported this idea · -
141 votes
It will be possible to maintain ongoing link between the role profile and the user record, so that you can use the template to assign a predefined set of roles to a user, and any further changes to templates will automatically affect the linked users' allowed roles.
Note - multiple profiles may be assigned to a user.
It will be possible to view the list of profiles an account is liked to for inheriting its roles, and to remove/add more profiles.
Walter supported this idea ·
It would really be helpful to have the possibility to push selected members of a itemized set to the MDE