Change priority of extracting 050 / 090 for ETL into Analytics LC Call number (Bib)
Currently, the ETL for a bib screen appears to overwrite the LC Classification Number (bibliographic record) with each 050 or 090 it reads. It is typical for the most 'authoritative' LC call number to be first on the record, while least authoritative (or even false) LC call numbers are last.
Consequently, when a bib record has more than one 050 or 090, Analytics is opting to report out the LEAST reliable call number for data.
Preferred would be that the ETL take only the first 050 in a record.
Michael Johnson
shared this idea
Hello All,
This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.
This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.
We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.
Alma Product Team