Skip to content

Nicolas C (Normandy)

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

18 results found

  1. Primo NDE: Make the display of user initials independent of the sort order for user names in Alma

    65 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  2. Incorporate a systematic review content type/filter into Primo

    168 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  3. Journal search>Browse by categories : allow indexing of Unimarc journals (PrimoVE)

    42 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  4. E-Resources: Make public note and authentication note translatable

    130 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Electronic  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  5. Add the Work Order Types sorting option

    30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 

  6. Correct closed fines/fees

    33 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - Fines &Fees  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  7. Personnalize "Users - Remove Blocks"

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  8. Primo VE : Alignment of Unimarc normalization rules with Marc21 normalization rules for the creation of the author facet

    73 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  9. Ability to create additional note fields in the physical item editor

    40 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  10. Fullfillment / Manage Patron Services - Action Claim returned - Freeze loan suspensions

    17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - Loans  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  11. Job “Withdraw Physical items” and holding of related records

    39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  12. Open Access Indicator for Unimarc records

    134 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  13. Add "Scan In Items" functions to "Return Items" processing

    56 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    On a related subject, I suggested this idea 49523462-simplify-item-scanning-when-processing-is-complete

    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  14. Simplify item scanning when processing is complete

    88 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 

  15. Statistical categories display in Circulation Desk UI

    100 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    Thanks for your comments!
    I also think that the presence of Statistical categories in the Fulfillment rules inputs is a valuable reason why.
    We use our users' statistical categories, and not just for reporting purposes. For example: we lend psychological tests, but only to psychology students and teachers, which is a statistical category. This criterion is used in our lending rules, but it would be better if it appeared in the fulfillment user interface.

    On an other hand, many libraries don't use the fee and fines, however these unuseful informations can't be removed from our UI. If we could do that, it'll make place for statistical categories, if there's a problem of place...

    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 

  16. ORCID iD Integration in Info Card for Contributor Page in Alma

    203 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    AdminAdina Marciano (Admin, Ex Libris) responded

    Thank you for the suggested idea. We see its value and will consider it in the future. This development requires integration with third-party providers, and we will need to investigate the possibility of this development.

    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  17. API for customization package deployment

    103 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  18. Add Related Record MARC fields 76X thru 78X to Analytics

    33 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    As it is not possible to :
    - Put only the content of a subfield in a LOCAL PARAM but only the whole field;
    - put together the contents of 2 MARC fields or subfields;
    - assign a field according to whether a content condition is met or not (presence of ' no:' ).
    And a fortiori to do these 3 things at the same time to index a LOCAL PARAM.

    An Analytics index for related records is essential to manage this type of documents.

    And thank you by the way for not neglecting the European customers using UNIMARC fields 461$v and 462$v ! ;^)

    Nicolas

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)