Skip to content

Nicolas C (Normandy)

My feedback

8 results found

  1. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 
  3. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    As it is not possible to :
    - Put only the content of a subfield in a LOCAL PARAM but only the whole field;
    - put together the contents of 2 MARC fields or subfields;
    - assign a field according to whether a content condition is met or not (presence of ' no:' ).
    And a fortiori to do these 3 things at the same time to index a LOCAL PARAM.

    An Analytics index for related records is essential to manage this type of documents.

    And thank you by the way for not neglecting the European customers using UNIMARC fields 461$v and 462$v ! ;^)

    Nicolas

  4. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    my suggestion is to shift the return date by as much of the closing day, not to count those days at all. So as to stagger returns after closings and not have large numbers of loans with the same date right at the opening.

    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 
  5. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    Thanks for the link, but not exactly. I insist on the different necessary modalities of use ("at home”, “in the library”, “Non-borrow” and “Confidential”

    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 
  6. 138 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 
  7. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 
  8. 53 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base