Nicolas C (Normandy)

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

12 results found

  1. Primo VE : Alignment of Unimarc normalization rules with Marc21 normalization rules for the creation of the author facet

    55 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    Merci Alexandre de cette initiative bienvenue ! Sommes-nous certains que les facettes identiques MARC21/UNIMARC seront fusionnées à l'affichage ?
    Thanks ALexandre for this welcom initiative! Are we sure that identical UNIMARC/MARC21 facets will be merged on display?

    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  2. Ability to create additional note fields in the physical item editor

    21 votes
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  3. Fullfillment / Manage Patron Services - Action Claim returned - Freeze loan suspensions

    17 votes
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - Loans  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  4. Job “Withdraw Physical items” and holding of related records

    32 votes
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  5. Open Access Indicator for Unimarc records

    133 votes
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  6. Search possibilities as "Received X weeks ago" or "Available X weeks ago"

    120 votes
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Resource Management - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  7. Add "Scan In Items" functions to "Return Items" processing

    56 votes
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    On a related subject, I suggested this idea 49523462-simplify-item-scanning-when-processing-is-complete

    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  8. Simplify item scanning when processing is complete

    83 votes
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Resource Management - Physical  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 

  9. Statistical categories display in Circulation Desk UI

    89 votes
    8 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment - General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    Thanks for your comments!
    I also think that the presence of Statistical categories in the Fulfillment rules inputs is a valuable reason why.
    We use our users' statistical categories, and not just for reporting purposes. For example: we lend psychological tests, but only to psychology students and teachers, which is a statistical category. This criterion is used in our lending rules, but it would be better if it appeared in the fulfillment user interface.

    On an other hand, many libraries don't use the fee and fines, however these unuseful informations can't be removed from our UI. If we could do that, it'll make place for statistical categories, if there's a problem of place...

    Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea  · 

  10. ORCID iD Integration in Info Card for Contributor Page in Alma

    202 votes
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Linked Data  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  11. API for customization package deployment

    104 votes
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea  · 

  12. Add Related Record MARC fields 76X thru 78X to Analytics

    34 votes
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nicolas C (Normandy) commented  · 

    As it is not possible to :
    - Put only the content of a subfield in a LOCAL PARAM but only the whole field;
    - put together the contents of 2 MARC fields or subfields;
    - assign a field according to whether a content condition is met or not (presence of ' no:' ).
    And a fortiori to do these 3 things at the same time to index a LOCAL PARAM.

    An Analytics index for related records is essential to manage this type of documents.

    And thank you by the way for not neglecting the European customers using UNIMARC fields 461$v and 462$v ! ;^)

    Nicolas

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)