Nicolas C (Normandy)
My feedback
14 results found
-
9 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
25 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
53 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
36 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
35 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
163 votes
Thank you for this idea.
We are considering adding a tooltip to the "Starts with" search operator, rather than displaying it only for the "Title" field.
The tooltip will explain that this search option is available only for the "Title" field.
We believe that if we won't display this search operator at all for the other fields, the user will not know that this search option is possible, since the default search is usually done on the "Any" field.
Thanks
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
294 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea ·
-
27 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicolas C (Normandy) commented
my suggestion is to shift the return date by as much of the closing day, not to count those days at all. So as to stagger returns after closings and not have large numbers of loans with the same date right at the opening.
Nicolas C (Normandy) shared this idea ·
-
135 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
Nicolas C (Normandy) supported this idea ·
As it is not possible to :
- Put only the content of a subfield in a LOCAL PARAM but only the whole field;
- put together the contents of 2 MARC fields or subfields;
- assign a field according to whether a content condition is met or not (presence of ' no:' ).
And a fortiori to do these 3 things at the same time to index a LOCAL PARAM.
An Analytics index for related records is essential to manage this type of documents.
And thank you by the way for not neglecting the European customers using UNIMARC fields 461$v and 462$v ! ;^)
Nicolas