AdminAdina Marciano
(Admin, Ex Libris)
My feedback
2 results found
-
68 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
75 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
AdminAdina Marciano
(Admin, Ex Libris)
commented
Hi,
In order to find the optimal solution, please help us expand our understanding of our needs.1. Can you explain why $t and not other subfields?
2. Do you see value in displaying other subfields besides $t? If yes, which ones matter most?
3. Would a configurable option to choose which subfields are displayed be useful to your workflow?
4. Currently, if we change the display to include additional subfields, then if there is information to be displayed within an info-card (Wikidata), it will either override the bib record's display or the info card will be removed (depending on development decisions).
If the system can’t find Wikidata info, would displaying data within an info card from your own bib/authority records still be valuable?5. If we do decide to create an "info card" with internal data only as well (such as $t), would showing the source of the information (Wikidata vs. internal data) be enough to avoid confusion?
Thank you for your time and efforts.
Hi Alison,
This is supported in the new Alma LOD editor, using a live lookup service to Wikidata when cataloging in BIBFRAME.