Lisa Hatt
My feedback
17 results found
-
27 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
17 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
124 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt supported this idea · -
236 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commentedI've run into this limitation and it was definitely frustrating.
Lisa Hatt supported this idea · -
48 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commentedYou can have my last vote! This would definitely be a very useful enhancement. Configuring Fulfillment is enough of a headache as it is.
Lisa Hatt supported this idea · -
159 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
57 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commentedI am out of votes, but I support this idea!
-
36 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
165 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
253 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
53 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commentedI stole a vote back from one of my other ideas so I could put three votes on this.
Lisa Hatt supported this idea · -
146 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
57 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
302 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commentedI agree with Anony's comment.
Lisa Hatt supported this idea · -
34 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
29 votesLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commentedYes, basing this on user group and library only is far too broad. I'm sure it's true for most libraries that some locations need to be exempted from auto-renewal.
We want this because the only times that we create records, they're all in categories we wouldn't want to publish anyway: reserves, streaming videos and ebooks that we can't loan and so don't want to attach WorldCat holdings to, temporary records for ordering.