Lisa Hatt

My feedback

  1. 156 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    I have already voted for this, but wanted to add that I agree with Peta's comment.

    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  2. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    I am out of votes, but this sounds like a useful idea.

  3. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    This should always be an option controllable by the user, whether because of a simple preference or because the device/browser they are using can't cope with a page that grows and grows. (In other words, an admin may choose a default, but the user should be able to choose otherwise.) Infinite-scroll-only cuts off access to later search results.

    If I am thinking of the correct page element by the "scroll button" (because it is on the right for me - probably depends on positioning of the sidebar?), this does not provide adequate access to pagination, because you cannot enter an arbitrary page number and can only navigate in two-page jumps in either direction. Probably most users would not really page (or scroll) through all the results in a very large set, but what about simply jumping to the end? Currently can't be done.

    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  4. 56 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    I am out of votes, but I support this idea!

  5. 67 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  6. 33 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  7. 323 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  8. 442 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    19 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    I agree with Peta that always being able to reimport a table (where that would be a sensible action) to make changes to whatever data it represents would be great - but that would probably have to be a separate enhancement (or from the sounds of it, an enhancement submitted for every.single.table where we want this, one at a time...).

    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    Yes! This is a source of everyday frustration for us. Always being able to sort by every header would be a sizable quality-of-life improvement.

  9. 100 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    Agree with Laura Krier- there's nothing magical about Lost that should mean a patron can't still claim they returned an item.

    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  10. 97 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  11. 166 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    Absolutely. That's a major reason to put enhanced coding in the 505 in the first place. The inconsistent treatment of $r and $t is strange.

    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  12. 61 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  13. 87 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  14. 214 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  15. 525 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  16. 226 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    Definitely... putting an item back on the shelf only to find that you immediately need it again for another request sounds like a hassle. Perhaps some kind of indicator to show that there are requests remaining, like how there is a little counter in search hitlists?

    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  17. 47 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    And make this something that is continually visible, not something that only appears on hover.

    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  18. 41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Lisa Hatt commented  · 

    I stole a vote back from one of my other ideas so I could put three votes on this.

    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  19. 101 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
  20. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Lisa Hatt supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base