Lisa Hatt
My feedback
-
156 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
40 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
I am out of votes, but this sounds like a useful idea.
-
74 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
This should always be an option controllable by the user, whether because of a simple preference or because the device/browser they are using can't cope with a page that grows and grows. (In other words, an admin may choose a default, but the user should be able to choose otherwise.) Infinite-scroll-only cuts off access to later search results.
If I am thinking of the correct page element by the "scroll button" (because it is on the right for me - probably depends on positioning of the sidebar?), this does not provide adequate access to pagination, because you cannot enter an arbitrary page number and can only navigate in two-page jumps in either direction. Probably most users would not really page (or scroll) through all the results in a very large set, but what about simply jumping to the end? Currently can't be done.
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
56 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
I am out of votes, but I support this idea!
-
67 votes
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
33 votes
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
323 votes
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
442 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
I agree with Peta that always being able to reimport a table (where that would be a sensible action) to make changes to whatever data it represents would be great - but that would probably have to be a separate enhancement (or from the sounds of it, an enhancement submitted for every.single.table where we want this, one at a time...).
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
Yes! This is a source of everyday frustration for us. Always being able to sort by every header would be a sizable quality-of-life improvement.
-
100 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
Agree with Laura Krier- there's nothing magical about Lost that should mean a patron can't still claim they returned an item.
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
97 votes
Hello,
Thank you for raising this request.
We will check if a signed agreement is required here in order to start the analysis and then will prioritize for future acquisition.Best,
RaelLisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
166 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
Absolutely. That's a major reason to put enhanced coding in the 505 in the first place. The inconsistent treatment of $r and $t is strange.
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
61 votes
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
87 votes
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
214 votes
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
525 votes
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
226 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
Definitely... putting an item back on the shelf only to find that you immediately need it again for another request sounds like a hassle. Perhaps some kind of indicator to show that there are requests remaining, like how there is a little counter in search hitlists?
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
And make this something that is continually visible, not something that only appears on hover.
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
41 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Lisa Hatt commented
I stole a vote back from one of my other ideas so I could put three votes on this.
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
101 votes
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Lisa Hatt supported this idea ·
I have already voted for this, but wanted to add that I agree with Peta's comment.