François Renaville

My feedback

  1. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  2. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Some configuration possibilities for the limitation of the length would indeed be great!

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  3. 90 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Thanks for creating this idea!

    We removed the Open Access and Peer-reviewed facets from our Primo VE Top Level section precisely because external data and Alma records are automatically excluded when using these facets. It would really be great if NRs could allow this!

    That Alma records are excluded with the Open Access and Peer-reviewed facets is really incomprehensible: PCI Articles published in "Nature Communications" are flagged as Open Access and Peer-Reviewed, but the journal itself (Alma record) not, although fields 500 and 506 contain the expected values...

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  4. 119 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  5. 24 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisitions  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville shared this idea  · 
  6. 124 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    I agree. This would be a most welcome enhancement!

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  7. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Thanks a lot, Ulrich! It works perfectly! I have just added some similar lines for Bibtex in custom.js:

    app.component('prmExportBibtexAfter', {
    bindings: { parentCtrl: '<' },
    controller: function() { this.parentCtrl.encodingVal = 'UTF-8'; },
    template: ''
    });

    and both do the job! :-) Thanks again!!

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  8. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  9. 71 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  10. 119 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  11. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Generally speaking, behavior should normally always be the same in the front-end wherever records are from (Alma or Aleph records vs PCI vs external harvested sources). Patrons should ideally not suffer from the origin of the records to have Primo functionalities working as expected (i.e. as they think they should work). Functionalities that are limited to a part of the whole content (e.g. Browse) are rarely understandable for patrons…

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  12. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville commented  · 

    This great idea would indeed offer some flexibility when processing requests! Thanks for submitting it!

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  13. 95 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Thanks for submitting this idea, Michael!

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  14. 57 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville shared this idea  · 
  15. 154 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  16. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  17. 258 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  18. 59 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville shared this idea  · 
  19. 108 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    I agree that 'Peer Reviewed' is not really appropriate in an Availability facet group. Note however that the library changes the Facet Label from 'Availability' to for example 'Show only' or 'Keep only', incongruity disappears. This works also for 'Open Access'. My 2 cents...

  20. 140 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Another example would be PhD thesis "Enforcing virtualized systems security" from author Hedi Benzina in 2012 that we find 3 times in our Primo FE because the thesis is available in three different activate PCI collections:
    - TN_abes_s2012DENS0085 (theses.fr Open Access)
    - TN_hal00846513 (HAL (Hyper Articles en Ligne))
    - TN_ndltdtel-00846513 (Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations)
    Obviously, FRBR process does not take author, title, year and type into account to create a FRBR group, what Normalization Rules can do with local records (Alma, Aleph...).

← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base