Peta Hopkins
My feedback
106 results found
-
5 votes
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment This is still a problem for us. Our case (05313147) has been closed and we have been advised that the new feature for date range selection is very useful to help us with this problem.
It's a nice feature but it in no way addresses the underlying problem that we have approval requests that just keep growing and growing and will never be either approved or rejected because the citation was deleted before we could address it.
So, NERS or idea exchange is our only hope.
Under NO circumstances do we want to delete approval requests that are either approved or rejected. We just want to be able to withdraw them before they get to that stage if there is no citation, or a cancelled digitization request.An error occurred while saving the comment Woot. Had some votes become available so I have added 2 for this idea.
An error occurred while saving the comment I don't have any votes left. But this is an issue for us when we rollover lists, the copyright is calculated and then before the course starts the instructor decides to delete citations from their rolled over list before the course starts and the library has even started to process them. We have case: 00892322
-
7 votes
-
55 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I have no votes left, but recalling my experience when trying to harvest records from our institutional repository it was so difficult. Making this easier for those who have to learn xpath from scratch would be so helpful.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment The Leganto file viewer also has no "quick cite", copy to my collection, mark as done, and only limited citation details visible.
If force_PDF_viewer is set to true, then students are unlikely to be able to use those functions, or even create a sensible citation from visible metadata.
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment This would be very convenient
-
3 votes
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Absolutely - just cleaning up a collection of 927 titles ergh! Publisher is searchable but you cannot display it in the table.
I'd like:
-filter by inventory types
-links to inventory &
-search by MMS ID and author
-sort the table based on header (title, material type etc)
-publication date
-select titles and push to metadata editor
Screenshot attached -
303 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1 - I have no votes left for Primo ideas, but this would be excellent
-
29 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Most of ours have a single representation so this has not been too painful for us. That said it has probably influenced us in how we have chosen to set up journals (each article or issue) gets its own bibliographic record, rather than them all be attached to a single bib. I'd like the flexibility to better support journals/volumes/issues/articles hierarchy and UX.
I found an example of a book with 2 volumes. Each volume has separate files for the chapters. https://librarysearch.bond.edu.au/permalink/61BOND_INST/ivhunt/alma9930443192602381In Primo the representation could be highlighted to indicate which ones contain the search terms, but then the user ends up with 10 or more files to choose from when they land in the Alma viewer.
For optimum experience the user could be helped towards the actual file. Natasha, would something like this screen shot be what you had in mind at least in the Primo side?
-
10 votes
-
18 votes
-
273 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1
-
0 votes
-
1 vote
-
48 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment No votes left, but I would support this. While the ILRS code (ALIA) advises that ensuring copyright compliance is the requesting library's responsibility, we are periodically messaged by some lending libraries asking us to confirm before they will supply. This would streamline the process.
-
100 votes
-
22 votes
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment At minimum the list selection options should work consistently with those in CiteIt too.
@Ronnie - I hear what you say about not seeing an alert in Leganto until you were already there. This idea is following on from the NERS proposal where an alert email is sent.
I imagine that having received such an alert I could go to Leganto and then deal with any number of broken link/problem files by using the notifications area. And of course also deal with any that are there if I arrive for some other reason.
Or starting in Alma with a citation alert on the task list, I then deal with that one, plus any others from within leganto and not need to go back to Alma for each one.
``````
We currently use LibAnswers for reporting back - we have to manually create the ticket, and use macros in the responses for the usual scenarios.
1. we have fixed it, let us know if you still have problems
2. can you provide some more information to help us diagnose
3. it's a Proquest ebook you just need to refresh the page (I think the most common broken link report we get - it would be nice if this UX could be handled on the proquest side. Our users just don't see the tiny message about refreshing)