Skip to content

Luigi Siciliano

My feedback

41 results found

  1. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  2. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Actually it would be great if all Public Notes, also those of electronic collection and electronic services and portfolios, could be translatable.

    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  3. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  4. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  5. 68 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Exporting structurally invalid binary MARC records sounds like more like an error that should be pointed out and fixed. Did anyone open a case about it?

  6. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    I just voted this idea and added a closely related one (whith a link to this Debora's idea as well):
    [Primo] - Add an enabled / disabled status field to pipes
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/36913195--primo-add-an-enabled-disabled-status-field-t

    I believe these two ideas are complementary.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Just made a mistake with because of an old pipe and was about to submit the same idea. Allowing deletion of old unused pipes would be absolutely great.

  7. 128 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Dear Susan, thank you very much. Since all in all it's deletion in Leganto the trigger, I decided to post this ideas in the Leganto section. Perhaps you have Leganto votes left and you can vote for the proposal there:
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/395697-leganto/suggestions/36750820-notify-when-a-title-esp-electronic-portfolio-ch

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  8. 16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  9. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Dear Stacey, dear all, the idea is not to have a pipe and a norm rule set for each collection.
    The customers should be able to select sources for PC exactly as they are doing now. And records in PC should be normalized by Ex Libris in the current PNX format exactly as they are now.

    But in Primo BE we should have an additional layer (it could be a pipe or something similar) with its norm rule set. This norm rule set would normalize, where required, the PC PNX records delivered by ex libris.

    In other words, I can imagine a pipe named "customerPCI", having as data source the customer's collections and current PNX as source format, and its Normalization Rule having PNX field as source and related transformation routines when needed.

    That would allow to make local PNX and PC PNX more consistent and improve blended search.

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  10. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  11. 87 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  12. 29 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  13. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  14. 103 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    @François,
    the solution you propose is quite powerful. Perhaps a bit complex to implement and manage, but of course powerful.
    Simply allowing to include/exclude in the index by resource type (e.g. exclude Book reviews and Reference and include articles) would be an important step ahead that perhaps is more doable in the short term.
    However the two ideas go in the same direction and make clear to ExL how some sort of improvement must be figured out.

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  15. 29 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  16. 44 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  17. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Dear Galen, the fact that "chapters and articles appear as 'no full text' but with the option to request the physical copy" seems like a good feature to me. I understand that for the distant reader it is not useful, but perhaps any other patron in the library would instead appreciate the chance of reading the desired chapter or article on paper.
    Something very bad I noticed is, however, that sometimes the feature leads to false positives, for example when the value in 245$a is short and common, such as, for example: 'History' or 'Macroeconomics'. In such a case, the GetIt would propose to request the item of the Physical Title having as 245$a 'History' or 'Macroeconomics' even if other metadata such as the author (!) are completely different from the ones in the PCI record.

  18. 118 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Let me add that the documentation section I quoted in this idea, explaining the current behavior, is the chapter "The FRBR Vector" in the Technical Guide.

    Can be found here:
    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/Technical_Guide/040FRBRization/010The_FRBR_Vector

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  19. 57 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Two closely related ideas are:

    new option/checkbox: "expand my results with synonyms"
    http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/18441406-new-option-checkbox-expand-my-results-with-synon

    Send the same enriched query (stemming, synonyms, etc) to both local index and Primo Central PC index ( important for blended search ) http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/18551905-send-the-same-enriched-query-stemming-synonyms

    There is also a thread in the Primo ML having as subject:
    [Primo] query enrichment is applied by default and is a bit a black box - need for improvements to linguistic features

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  20. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Two closely related ideas are:

    new option/checkbox: "expand my results with synonyms"
    http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/18441406-new-option-checkbox-expand-my-results-with-synon

    Show the terms added to the patron's query by the linguistic features (i.e. stemming, synonyms etc.) http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/18551809-show-the-terms-added-to-the-patron-s-query-by-the

    There is also a thread in the Primo ML having as subject:
    [Primo] query enrichment is applied by default and is a bit a black box - need for improvements to linguistic features

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base