Skip to content

AdminMoshe Shechter (Alma Senior Product Manager, Ex Libris)

My feedback

147 results found

  1. 373 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Yes, that is the idea.

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Definitely makes sense ! I think a good approach would be a configurable code table of 10 fee statuses/transaction types that can be activated and customized by the institution. These statuses will be considered closed, but will appear with the description customized by the institution

  2. 153 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    We would like to look into this option after the new Circulation Desk UI (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Materials/010Roadmap/Workflow_Simplification#Circulation_Desk_Redesign) is rolled out.

  3. 156 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Can't the history requests be viewed in the requests monitor ?

  4. 163 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Of course ! It is already possible to convert a resource sharing request to a purchase request. The reverse should also be possible.

  5. 169 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Makes sense ! We should have a 'Run a Job' option to launch a job on a list of items to change the due date of the set's items to a new due date

  6. 280 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    This may be rather complicated. There is no standard ISO message that would support communicating a recall cancellation between borrower and lender

  7. 228 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    So, I guess we want it to be possible to configure a warning that pops up when the Change Due Date is used on a recalled loan and that the warning should be overridable. When doing Change Due Date on multiple items, if this block is configured then the pop up will notify that some of the loans are recalled and allow to choose action.

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Can you share more information about when this happens ? The 'Change Due Date' tool does not revert the loan status, and the Renew action is indeed blocked. Can you explain in what scenario recalled item reverts back to its initial status ?

  8. 230 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    There are a number of separate ideas packed into this single one. Please split into separate ideas to enable processing each independently.

  9. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Is the On Shelf Policy 'No requesting' not a good fit ? It is defined -

    If a title has a physical holding at a physical location that is associated with a fulfillment unit for which On shelf request policy is set to No requesting, then any physical holding of that title, regardless of the On shelf request policy setting of the fulfillment unit at its location, is not requestable. This means that other holdings of the title that belong to any fulfillment unit cannot be requested (for instance, by patrons through Primo). To avoid this scenario, On shelf request policy should instead be set to No requesting from available holdings
    (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/030Fulfillment/080Configuring_Fulfillment/020Fulfillment_Infrastructure/Configuring_Physical_Fulfillment)

  10. 33 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    You may want to take a look at the On Shelf Policy option "No requesting from available holding". Tis option means that no item under the BIB record can be requested when in all holding records there is an item available on shelf but if in any holding there is no item on shelf, the request is possible and will be attached to one of the items under this holding.

  11. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Are you familiar with the Restricting Users for Editing (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/050Administration/040Configuring_User_Management/020Roles_and_Registration_Configuration#Restricting_Users_for_Editing) option ? You may be able to set up the User Manager role in the Users Restricted for Editing table, and then create the user manager accounts that you want to limit with a “Can’t edit restricted users” attribute. These users will not be able to update any user manager’s account, including not their own.

  12. 314 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Can you elaborate on why pickup location is required for loans ?

  13. 77 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Have you tried to have also the 'User List View' privilege removed ? It should remove the users search option

  14. 24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  15. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Is this not addressed by the new UI's labels and notes indication (attached) ?

  16. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Does not the 'Item has not been received by Acquisitions Department' block preference cover that ? See https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/030Fulfillment/080Configuring_Fulfillment/Configuring_Loans

  17. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Is this in the context of resource sharing, or regular requests ? Can you elaborate on the expected workflow ?

  18. 58 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  19. 153 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Would this action be different from renew ? Checking out an already on loan item can be used to trigger a renew.

  20. 29 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Assigning a 'Circulation communication' address to the institution or to a library enables a 'From' address on library emails. The 'From'address will be visible to patrons and patrons will be able to reply to it.

    This also enables users to indicate separate 'From' email addresses for the different libraries of the institution. If the circulation communication email is not indicated for the library, the circulation communication email indicated for the institution is taken.

    See https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/050Administration/050Configuring_General_Alma_Functions/020Managing_Institutions_and_Libraries#Configuring_Institution.2FLibrary_Contact_Information.

    Does that match the required feature ?

← Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8

Feedback and Knowledge Base