Skip to content

Luigi Siciliano

My feedback

49 results found

  1. 18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  2. 257 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Dear Moshe, yes, the scheduled job you describe would absolutely do the trick!

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  3. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  4. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  5. 26 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    I strongly support this old idea. Time and tabs in the UI go by but this need remains. The match with print journals is a wonderful feature, but unfortunately its implementation is poor. Here is a recent example in our catalogue: https://ubz-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/urcfc9/TN_springer_jour10.1007/s40888-016-0034-2
    We don't have the full-text, and we propose the print version of the journal. But we don't cover the needed year, thus making the patron confused.
    If the year of publication and/or the issue could be considered as they are for the electronic version, that would be great.

  6. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  7. 25 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  8. 81 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  9. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  10. 82 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    I absolutely agree this behavior should be out of the box.
    Meanwhile, I found this ( https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Community_Knowledge/Adding_statement_of_responsibility_to_Title_in_Primo_VE ) and I merged it with Jesse Kruppa (UCR) customization below.
    Following rule is the result:

    rule "Primo VE - Title"
    when
    MARC."245" has any "a,b,c"
    then
    set TEMP"1" to MARC."245" sub without sort "a,b"
    remove string (TEMP"1","<<")
    remove string (TEMP"1",">>")
    remove substring using regex (TEMP"1","(,|/|:|;|=)+$")
    set TEMP"2" to MARC."245" subfields "c"
    concatenate with delimiter (TEMP"1",TEMP"2"," / ")
    create pnx."display"."title" with TEMP"1"
    end

    This rule is not for a local field but I'like to use it as a replacement for the current display.title rule, as detailed here: https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Community_Knowledge/Adding_statement_of_responsibility_to_Title_in_Primo_VE

    I am testing it in our environment. Anyone willing to test it as well and to provide some feedback ?...

    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  11. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  12. 36 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  13. 78 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  14. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  15. 68 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    This rather old idea is still a very good one. reCaptcha is annoying and has issues with privacy policies. Forcing a registration for this feature would make the option safer without the need of any reCaptcha step.

  16. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  17. 48 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear community,   

    I would like to update you that this idea is planned to be developed. Thew planned solution will allow to limit users to be able to install/use only cloud apps that they have the proper roles for operating, meaning - users will not be able to install/use a cloud app they do not have the required roles to operate it. And, it will support the option for enabling the use of cloud apps only for users that are specifically chosen (by giving them a dedicated role for that), Meaning - users will be able to install/use cloud apps only if they were given a dedicated role for that.

    If nothing will come up during development, this is currently planned to be released in 2024 H2.

    Thanks, 

    Uri Beladev 

    Library Platform, Product Management team

    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  18. 80 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    We strongly support implementation of this idea and we rely on Alma + Primo classic.
    Actually, rather than an enhancement request, it looks to me that the current behaviour of Database type collections is inconsistent with the general behavior of collections in the system, and should be fixed without the need of an enhancement request.

  19. 108 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    The feature should of course work for both Lending and Borrowing requests, not for Borrowing only.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    This 2015 idea is very useful and has been accepted at the end of 2020.
    Any news on the roadmap for implementing it?
    It becomes even more useful since in the new RS UI there is a new default to external identifier instead of the last used index, which makes everyday work a bit harder.
    According to my ILL colleagues, if ALL as suggested here is not doable, a default KEYWORDS index with at least External and Internal Identifiers, Title, Journal Title and Authors would be a great step in the right direction.

  20. 96 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    I mean of course update the value in purge date when saving *the user*.

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base