Luigi Siciliano

My feedback

  1. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    I strongly support this old idea. Time and tabs in the UI go by but this need remains. The match with print journals is a wonderful feature, but unfortunately its implementation is poor. Here is a recent example in our catalogue: https://ubz-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/urcfc9/TN_springer_jour10.1007/s40888-016-0034-2
    We don't have the full-text, and we propose the print version of the journal. But we don't cover the needed year, thus making the patron confused.
    If the year of publication and/or the issue could be considered as they are for the electronic version, that would be great.

  2. 331 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  3. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  4. 160 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hello all,

    Over the past months we have attempted to reach out to this provider unsuccessfully.
    If anyone from the community has a contact person at La Mia Biblioteca please send us this information so that perhaps we can establish communication.
    If we cannot establish contact we will need to decline this request.

    Thank you,
    Rael

    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  5. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  6. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  8. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  9. 70 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  10. 78 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  11. 254 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  12. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo  ·  Admin →
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  13. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  14. 63 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Exporting structurally invalid binary MARC records sounds like more like an error that should be pointed out and fixed. Did anyone open a case about it?

  15. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    I just voted this idea and added a closely related one (whith a link to this Debora's idea as well):
    [Primo] - Add an enabled / disabled status field to pipes
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/36913195--primo-add-an-enabled-disabled-status-field-t

    I believe these two ideas are complementary.

    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Just made a mistake with because of an old pipe and was about to submit the same idea. Allowing deletion of old unused pipes would be absolutely great.

    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
  16. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  17. 76 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Dear Susan, thank you very much. Since all in all it's deletion in Leganto the trigger, I decided to post this ideas in the Leganto section. Perhaps you have Leganto votes left and you can vote for the proposal there:
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/395697-leganto/suggestions/36750820-notify-when-a-title-esp-electronic-portfolio-ch

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  18. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  19. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Dear Stacey, dear all, the idea is not to have a pipe and a norm rule set for each collection.
    The customers should be able to select sources for PC exactly as they are doing now. And records in PC should be normalized by Ex Libris in the current PNX format exactly as they are now.

    But in Primo BE we should have an additional layer (it could be a pipe or something similar) with its norm rule set. This norm rule set would normalize, where required, the PC PNX records delivered by ex libris.

    In other words, I can imagine a pipe named "customerPCI", having as data source the customer's collections and current PNX as source format, and its Normalization Rule having PNX field as source and related transformation routines when needed.

    That would allow to make local PNX and PC PNX more consistent and improve blended search.

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
  20. 30 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3

Feedback and Knowledge Base