Curran Riley
My feedback
31 results found
-
55 votesCurran Riley
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
284 votes
We are considering incorporating the idea and effect both templates and rules editing permission
Curran Riley
supported this idea
·
-
52 votesCurran Riley
supported this idea
·
-
219 votes
A check box will be available when selecting the 'restore' option to enable clearing out the temporary information fields.
-
205 votesCurran Riley
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesCurran Riley
supported this idea
·
-
156 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that this is planned to be added in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface. We are planning to add it as a separate "Quick filter" option for a results list.
More details on the new interface planning can be found here -
Best regards,
Yael.
Curran Riley
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesCurran Riley
supported this idea
·
-
65 votesCurran Riley
shared this idea
·
-
135 votesCurran Riley
supported this idea
·
-
94 votesCurran Riley
supported this idea
·
The University of Wisconsin system agrees with this idea. We use APIs to load and sometimes alter patron data. One example is replacing legal names with preferred names (Alma does not yet have fields dedicated to preferred names).
When we replace a legal name with a preferred name, we'd like to add a note specific to this scenario that indicates a name has been changed and includes the legal name. The legal name will then still be in the Alma patron record and can be used for verification, the collection of fines and fees, etc.
We'd like to have a note type that is reserved for this purpose, and that means we want to create our own note types to avoid collisions with other library staff use. We have asked for different barcode types in the past, and had them added, and this seems like it could be solved in a similar manner.