Move Peer Reviewed into it's own facet group
The Peer Reviewed facet is currently grouped in the Availability facet group. It has nothing to do with Availability or the other things in the Availability facet group. Not seeing another facet group that makes sense, Peer Reviewed should be in it's own facet group. This will make more sense to the user, allow more flexibility in controlling the placement and the look and feel of these individual facets.
William Doering
shared this idea
-
Manu_Schwendener
commented
I don't consider this completed.
-
Manu_Schwendener
commented
> Note however that the library changes the Facet Label from 'Availability' to for
> example 'Show only' or 'Keep only', incongruity disappears.But this stays: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/40692283-reconcile-top-level-facet-selection-one-by-one-vs
-
Lyn Moore
commented
I agree Peer Reviewed doesn't belong under Availability it requires it's own facet group.
-
François Renaville
commented
I agree that 'Peer Reviewed' is not really appropriate in an Availability facet group. Note however that the library changes the Facet Label from 'Availability' to for example 'Show only' or 'Keep only', incongruity disappears. This works also for 'Open Access'. My 2 cents...
-
Kimberly Willson-St. Clair commented
I agree with this perspective as well as adding Open Access to the Peer Review grouping.
Kimberly
-
Blake Galbreath
commented
@William - would you consider adding the new Open Access facet to this group?
Blake