Sophie Delarze
My feedback
30 results found
-
NDE UI - Improving UX locations section
-
current-situation-3.png 95 KB -
current-situation-4.png 4 KB -
improvement-with-CSS-customization-3.png 76 KB -
current-situation-1.png 48 KB -
improvement-with-CSS-customization-4.png 76 KB -
current-situation-2.png 75 KB -
improvement-with-CSS-customization-1.png 23 KB -
improvement-with-CSS-customization-2.png 57 KB
17 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
-
26 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
171 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Amy Copeland
Senior Product Manager
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
40 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Amy Copeland
Senior Product Manager
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. The Rialto team is reviewing this idea to determine how it might fit into our future plans. We cannot provide a timeline for these ideas, but be sure to check back often and vote for the ideas you support to receive status and comment updates.
Best,
Amy Copeland
Senior Product Manager
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
279 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for raising this idea.
This was part of the CERV cycle in 2025, but did not make it to the final list.
During the analysis, 3 possible approaches were discussed, each has a different estimation and effort:
Option 1: New dedicated process type
- It will be possible to mark specific items as "unavailable", similarly to the way it is possible to mark them as "missing"
- Items marked as "unavailable" will be considered as "not in place"
- The new "unavailable" option will appear as a possible process type in all the places where there is a list of process types, including configuration options such as Fulfillment Unit Rules
Option 2: Mark a location as "unavailable"
- It will be possible to mark a location as "unavailable"
- All items in this location will be considered as "not in place"
- The difference from option 1 is that when an item…
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
42 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
184 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
101 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
88 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
86 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
157 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·
-
112 votes
Sophie Delarze
supported this idea
·