Elizabeth York
My feedback
34 results found
-
486 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Elizabeth York
supported this idea
·
-
116 votes
Hello,
I am glad to inform that we are communicating with Kanopy to explore ways in obtaining metadata for their collection.
I will update this idea as we make progress.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth York
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesElizabeth York
shared this idea
·
-
245 votes
Hello all,
As planned, we are moving forward with this ingestion. You will see a zero-title database in the KBs, as we work towards indexing this content in CDI.
Best,
Rael
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth York
commented
Hi Rael & Ex Libris,
We're interested in knowing how this is progressing. We see there is a collection titled "Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP)" in Alma with link in record records, but we're not sure if this is the planned GPO Marcive collection. Could Ex Libris please let us know, is this the planned GPO Marcive collection? If not, could we please have an update on how this is proceeding? Thank you!
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth York
commented
Thanks, Rael, for this update! We are looking forward to this! I'd just like to note that in order for MARCIVE records to work well in the KBs, Ex Libris will need to obtain the full MARCs from MARCIVE. Just loading a KBART file or title list won't work because many of these items don't have ISSNs or ISBNs. So, I'm hopeful you'll be able to load the full MARCs supplied by MARCIVE into the CZ!
Elizabeth York
supported this idea
·
-
80 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth York
commented
I support this idea, but I think it should be done for both Public Note and Authentication Note. Both these notes are important and should be displayable on all full text links.
Elizabeth York
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesElizabeth York
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth York
commented
This would be a helpful improvement that would reduce the amount of manual work customers must do!
-
117 votes
Thank you for the idea, a delete action will be added for each portfolio presented in the MDEditor-> View Inventory
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth York
commented
I just want to add that I hope this can be carefully implemented with permissions in mind. There may be some metadata editors who should only be able to edit physical inventory, not electronic.
-
267 votesElizabeth York
supported this idea
·
-
315 votesElizabeth York
supported this idea
·
-
764 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Elizabeth York
supported this idea
·
-
317 votesElizabeth York
supported this idea
·
-
219 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Elizabeth York
commented
In Alma, automated processes and jobs can suppress and unsuppress bibliographic records. It is also possible to suppress and unsuppress individual bib records using the metadata editor. However, Alma does not track the history of record suppressions and unsuppressions.
This means that when we come across an incorrectly suppressed record in Alma, we have no way to determine when it was suppressed and what job (or which Alma user) suppressed it. This makes it more difficult to correct workflow problems and monitor automated processes that may be acting in unexpected ways.
This idea proposes that Alma should track bibliographic record suppressions and unsuppressions. Each suppression event should include the date and time and the identifier of the job/process or Alma user who suppressed the record.
Elizabeth York
supported this idea
·
-
70 votesElizabeth York
shared this idea
·
-
69 votes
Dana Moshkovits
responded
Clarification was provided regarding the functionality requested – which is not to delete portfolios but rather detaching portfolios from the collection and setting them as standalone portfolios.
Re-opening the idea.Elizabeth York
supported this idea
·
How is this process going? We hope that Kanopy's full title list can be added to the Alma CZ. This collection should use Kanopy's full MARC records (like the Alexander Street video collections in the CZ use the full records from Alexander Street), and each record should contain a Kanopy-specific identifier in an 035 field that can be matched using the portfolio loader so we can selectively activate just our Kanopy titles using the portfolio loader.