How can we improve Content?

← Content

MARCIVE GPO Database

We would love to see MARCIVE's GPO database added to the PCI.

For more details, see:
http://home.marcive.com/gpo

247 votes
Vote

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
Roland Samieske shared this idea  ·   ·  Admin →

18 comments

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close
Submitting...
An error occurred while saving the comment
  • Tina Gross commented  · 

    There is so much redundant work going on around the country, with many libraries loading the same records. It's a huge waste of time and effort. And it would be easy to avoid!

  • Ben Hockenberry commented  · 

    I appreciate the Anonymous commenter (2020-07-20)'s description of the GPO record set overwhelming local results. However, without the record set being available as a CDI source, institutions cannot make the choice to include them without going through separate and time-intensive MARC loads. I would like to see GPO content available to activate in CDI, optimistically trusting that Primo's relevance ranking and facets will appropriately surface local records.

  • Anonymous commented  · 

    A no vote. I remember from my intesive reference work at a partial GPO Depository that the GPO results were enormous and that they often buried/obsfucated the local resources. I would prefer to only add such resources if I as a researcher were interested in the additional content as I cast my net. So the question would become, would our users know of this effect and how could they quickly adjust for it in the OneSearch environment? Are the limiters strong enough to be able to quickly remove the results?

    I'd be very cautious with this "improvement."

  • Clay Williams commented  · 

    Please Add Marcives GPO DB --they are wonderful resources for the students

  • Bernice Suphal commented  · 

    Please add Marcive's GPO database to the PC--it should be included.

  • Mariana R. commented  · 

    A plea from a reference librarian to do this! It's so confusing for students otherwise.

  • Rebecca Arzola commented  · 

    Yes, please add Marcive's GPO database to the PCI.

  • Sean O'Heir commented  · 

    Please add the Marcive GPO DB to the PCI

  • Nicole Smith commented  · 

    Yes, please!! This is critical for us in Gov Docs to streamline workflows.

  • Louise Fluk commented  · 

    Agree that government documents should be included in CDI.

  • Daniela Kroon commented  · 

    I am also curious to know what the status of the review is. Having the records available in CDI will streamline workflows, making records available seamless for retrieval.

  • Nancy Babb commented  · 

    We would also like very much to see MARCIVE GPO in the PCI. Any status updates on this collection?

Content: New Collection

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)