Ben Hockenberry

My feedback

  1. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  2. 284 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  3. 131 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  4. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  5. 85 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Link Resolver  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  6. 380 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry commented  · 

    The documentation Itai shared does not show SEARCHING within results -- it is about displaying results and then clicking items to remove. For a small set this can be meaningful, but for a large set, a user has to hunt through pages and pages of results to identify a particular record.

    Ability to search within an itemized set without constructing indication rules would save a lot of time for users, and would allow for searching non-MARC Alma fields that are not reached by indication rules.

  7. 61 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  8. 442 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  9. 700 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  10. 295 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  11. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  12. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  13. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry shared this idea  · 
  14. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry shared this idea  · 
  15. 56 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  16. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  17. 89 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  18. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry commented  · 

    This would be very valuable. We need to be able to create a set of physical items based on ID matches that only exist in the Title record. Thanks to Sam Nesbit for sharing one workaround, however ridiculous it is. Solutions that require multiple edits to a record and exporting and reimporting from an external system (across multiple days) should NOT be the expected workflow.

    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  19. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
  20. 136 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Ben Hockenberry commented  · 

    In addition, if a letter is turned off, "Failed" alert should display a more meaningful (and less alarmist) text, like "The Borrowing Activity Report queued by this action has been disabled."

    Ben Hockenberry supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base