Ben Hockenberry
My feedback
17 results found
-
219 votes
A check box will be available when selecting the 'restore' option to enable clearing out the temporary information fields.
An error occurred while saving the comment -
63 votes
AdminTamar Ganor (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
An error occurred while saving the comment Ben Hockenberry commented
This would be a fantastic solution. Aggregator collections that primarily provide full text after issue assignment would have a checkbox set to “includes full text of preprints? No.”
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
71 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
476 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
311 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
81 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
226 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that we are planning to develop this option in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface planning can be found here -
Best regards,
Yael.
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
275 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Ben Hockenberry commented
I realize this is quite an old idea, and not specifically related to Primo VE, but for Alma/Primo VE/CDI, the addition of the Open Access facet SHOULD have done this. But oddly, links from open access records do not display to users unless an associated portfolio/collection has been activated in Alma. So the article-level open access status is shown to users, but they can't get to the content. Attached is a screenshot documenting that problem.
-
22 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
178 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
59 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
159 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
396 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ben Hockenberry commented
The documentation Itai shared does not show SEARCHING within results -- it is about displaying results and then clicking items to remove. For a small set this can be meaningful, but for a large set, a user has to hunt through pages and pages of results to identify a particular record.
Ability to search within an itemized set without constructing indication rules would save a lot of time for users, and would allow for searching non-MARC Alma fields that are not reached by indication rules.
-
30 votes
AdminTamar Ganor (Admin, Ex Libris) responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
167 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
229 votes
Ben Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
187 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ben Hockenberry commented
In addition, if a letter is turned off, "Failed" alert should display a more meaningful (and less alarmist) text, like "The Borrowing Activity Report queued by this action has been disabled."
Is there an expected time frame for the checkbox?