Manu Schwendener

My feedback

259 results found

  1. 64 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    Hi

    Is this solved by now?

    (sorry, won't get notified if you reply)

  2. 165 votes
    12 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    As this won't happen in Primo VE for performance reasons, maybe the thread could/should be closed as "won't do" to release the votes?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    Did not make it though round 2 of NERS.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    NERS 7855, round 2 open for voting now.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    > This is functionality that I see in other library catalogs

    And it's apparently a parity issue compared to Primo BO.

    Via the Primo mailing list:

    "BO has a top level “Available in the Library” facet to limit your results to just items that are available on shelf, while VE has a similarly named “Held By Library” facet that limits items to physical titles – whether or not they are on shelf."

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    NERS 7855, open for voting now

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    +1

  3. 43 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  4. 139 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  5. 68 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    I understand this wish, but I would rather say:

    In addition to the interface language of Primo, also let the patrons choose the language they want to be contacted in.

    Reason: just because your interface has several languages doesn't mean that all the texts of your letters/emails have been translated to the same languages.

    For example:
    Our interface could be in German Italian French and English,
    but maybe our letters only have German and English texts.

    ---

    The feature also needs to take in account patrons that are managed externally.

  6. 32 votes
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  7. 62 votes
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    This is a parity issue:

    While in Primo BO field 250 is not indexed for search out of the box, either (although it should be), it is easy to just add the field to general search.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 
  8. 19 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    Hi Jesse

    As a workaround, have you tried
    Ranking configuration – Resource type boosting?

    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/020Primo_VE/Primo_VE_(English)/040Search_Configurations/Configuring_the_Ranking_of_Search_Results_in_Primo_VE

    "To specify a negative boost, enter a value between 0.0 and 1.0 (such as 0.01)."

    ---

    At least in Primo VE the change should take effect almost immediately, no need to re-index.

    (Sorry, I won't get notified if you reply here)

  9. 0 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  10. 257 votes
    5 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    > can be customized via Primo VE Normalization Rules

    My guess is that this was hardcoded in 2018, but no longer is.

    Could the idea be closed to free the votes?

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    Sarah, is this still an open enhancement request? If yes, could you link to an example in your Primo VE catalog?

    Thank you

    (I won't get notified of your reply though, sorry)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    > 655 $a should be displayed in Primo as "Genre", not "Subject"

    Please also vote for https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/45177370-remove-655-from-the-subject-facet

  11. 1 vote
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  12. 1 vote
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  13. 59 votes
    How important is this to you?
  14. 73 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    > Starts With would be the best and most logical limiter for users for a call
    > number search, but it's not available.

    This made it through round two of NERS 2022 (7986), possible since Febraury 2023 (only locations, not tems - same as browse search).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    Please consider also voting for

    Call number index – include item call numbers (not only holdings)

    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/43401771-call-number-index-include-item-call-numbers-not

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    > Starts With appears to be an option until you click on it, and then Call Number changes
    > to Title which becomes unavailable to change

    See also here https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/19676293-only-show-starts-with-for-relevant-fields

  15. 1 vote
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  16. 109 votes
    How important is this to you?
  17. 12 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  18. 1 vote
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment
  19. 0 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
  20. 106 votes
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 

    Thank you for clarifying, Julio

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Manu Schwendener commented  · 
1 2 5 7 9 12 13

Feedback and Knowledge Base