Patricia Farnan
My feedback
162 results found
-
82 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
178 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
87 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
I support this idea, though I don't currently have any votes available
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
I support this idea. I have no spare votes but just wanted to leave a comment.
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Just popping back to say that although we don't use Q&A yet, we would support development of this idea.
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
I was just looking through old emails and saw this. Great idea! I'm currently out of votes but hopefully will have some free soon.
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
This is a good idea, would be very helpful.
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
This is a good idea.
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Good idea. We would need to be able to choose the instructor since our Courses have numerous 'instructors' affiliated, even if only one or two are actually doing the teaching.
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
This is a good idea and seems a no brainer. Hopefully this can become at the very least a setting institutions can choose for themselves.
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
I had no idea that the "automatic" purchase request process wasn't automatic ... seems a bit silly to call it automatic if that's the case! We have wanted to implement citation processing rules but found them far too broad to work for us. Hence our requests via CERV for more granularity. But if in future that side of it improved, we would want to implement them. However, this would ideally be fixed first as well.
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
It makes sense to expand this functionality to all Leganto-related task lists (or all task lists in general perhaps!).
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
This would be a valuable improvement.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
This would be very helpful in reducing clutter/confusion for staff.
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Good idea.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
We had a CERV request this year for the same thing: LENH-I-6033: Allow Library staff to merge duplicated Reading Lists. It didn't get through beyond the first round sadly, but we will re-submit it next year.
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Although we don't use the Q&A feature yet, someday if we get it to work we would like to see this option in place.
Great idea. I gave it some votes.