Anonymous
My feedback
125 results found
-
274 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
45 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Hi,
We will reach out to Elsevier and ask for the metadata for this collection.
Regards,
Rachel
Senior Content Support Analyst
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to the provider and ask for the metadata for this collection.
Thanks,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product ManagerAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Hello,
We will take this with the Alma product team to decide what is the best approach for this request.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
797 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
198 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
230 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
281 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
408 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
27 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
93 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
213 votes
Dear community,
Thank you for the idea. We suggest the following high level solution:
1. In Resources menu > Overlap and Collection Analysis > Compare collection analysis, it will be possible to select multiple match methods, from the existing list of match methods, and the order in which they will be used
2. The match will work as following: Try to match by method #1. If no match was found, try to match by method #2.
3. The report will include information on the matched identifier and its value
4. Similarly, in Resources menu > Overlap and Collection Analysis > Look Up Titles, it will be possible to upload an input file with multiple identifiers columns. The possible identifiers are the existing ones, and columns format will be the same as today. The difference is that it will be possible to place multiple identifier columns, in the order they should be used.
Thaks,
Tamar Fuches
Alma team
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
53 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
72 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
207 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
476 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
659 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
641 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
50 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·