Dafna
My feedback
27 results found
-
74 votesDafna
shared this idea
·
-
109 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Dafna
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
-
58 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 voteAdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Dafna
shared this idea
·
-
12 votesDafna
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteDafna
shared this idea
·
-
91 votes
We are investigating how we can develop/support this functionality, thanks!
Dafna
supported this idea
·
-
97 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Dafna
commented
According to an Ex Libris documentation from 2014, the solution is in development.
Please see the link:
https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Knowledge_Articles/Results_vary_for_hyphenated_search_terms
We are still waiting for it to be resolved.An error occurred while saving the comment Dafna
commented
This feature is very important for Arabic as well.
Dafna
supported this idea
·
-
77 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesDafna
shared this idea
·
-
128 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
-
26 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
-
167 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
Dear all,
After further analysis, we believe the correct solution here would be to add a separate Alma facet for archival materials, so's not to create confusion or inconsistencies regarding resource types.
An error occurred while saving the comment Dafna
commented
Hi Yoel,
Thank you for considering this idea!
1
Yes, we think it is important to have “Archival Material” in the Facets in Alma (they appear in Primo).
2.
No comment.
3.
I have no objection to have just the LDR pos 8 = “a” as the input to be defined as “Archival Material”, however, please note that in the Primo documentation it says that in order for a record to be defined as “Archival Material” it should have LDR pos 6 = p
https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Product_Documentation/020Primo_VE/Primo_VE_(English)/120Other_Configurations/Mapping_to_the_Display%2C_Facets%2C_and_Search_Sections_in_the_Primo_VE_Record
So, there is a mismatch between the two.
If we want to have a record to be define as Archival Material, we will have to have:
LDR pos 6 = P --> for Primo
LDR pos 8 = a --> for Alma
So anyway the LDR pos 6 should be “p”, unless you decide to change the Primo settings.
4.
It depends if you decide to add LDR pos 6 to the conditions.
It looks like the table is somewhat sorted according to the LDR positions.
If “p” will be part of the condition, I guess it should be one of the lasts, since it check according to the ABC of the LDR (please let me know if this is completely wrong).
5.
See the answer to question 3.Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with.
Thanks,
Dafna
Dafna Mizrahi-Melcer | Head of Technical ServicesMt. Scopus Library For The Humanities and Social Sciences
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
T +972.2.5882145 | F +972.25880167
dafnam@savion.huji.ac.ilDafna
shared this idea
·
-
30 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
-
161 votes
Hi all,
This is planned to be handled in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface planning can be found here -
Best regards,
Yael.
Dafna
supported this idea
·
-
308 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesDafna
supported this idea
·
Hello,
There isn't any job for activation or deactivation of multiple CDI collections simultaneously, so any development of this kind of job would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Dafna