Stacey van Groll
My feedback
162 results found
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
While I completely agree with this need for documentation, I can't in good conscience give it any of my limited 25 votes, because it's not a new feature or improvement to existing functionality which is the purpose of this forum.
Ex Libris is responsible and expected to communicate and document their system and any system changes as a standard expectation of a system vendor. -
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
I'm not sure how this is obvious, as the electronic titles search is for titles which have electronic inventory.
If Titles without inventory are desired to be found, then the All Titles search is available for that. -
53 votesStacey van Groll
supported this idea
·
-
100 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
I think perhaps this is covered by an existing idea?
-
181 votesStacey van Groll
supported this idea
·
-
73 votesStacey van Groll
supported this idea
·
-
88 votesStacey van Groll
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesStacey van Groll
shared this idea
·
-
After three days, the system should send another reminder email to the reader who requested the book
1 voteAn error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
I'm not sure I understand the request. What would Alma be advising the patron about, who has requested the book? It seems like a better workflow would be Alma reminding the person who has the item on loan of the need for return, rather than the requester who wants a recall, if that is the use case.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
The current behaviour is to allow patrons to request items in work orders, and by the title this is already supported.
But from the text of the submission, it's really the opposite ask - to add a configuration option to configure specific work orders so that it's not possible to place a request when an item is in that particular work order. -
1 voteStacey van Groll
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
It's sounding like a defect regression to me, to report in a case.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
The attachment shows a "How to get it" rather than a "View it".
The "How to get it" is present for showing access services such as placing a document delivery request when the resource is not held in any inventory form.
I'm not familiar with it displaying completely blank, as there should be a label such as "No available services for this item".
Perhaps check the relevant code for Getit table to see if the Description has been removed previously from UI by change to ?
Otherwise, perhaps useful to show a self-help option by GES such as linking to web content for placing requests or a contact page for library support services? -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
This idea is better placed in Primo Idea Exchange rather than Alma Idea Exchange, and Collection Discovery is not limited to Alma-Digital content.
I do think likely it’s already covered already though by other Primo Idea Exchange ideas, which are also marked as Planned by Ex Libris Primo Product Management in some cases:
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/45539545-collection-discovery-allow-searching-subcollectio
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/46899064-consistent-ux-or-labelling-for-collection-discover
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/44803108-collection-discovery-sub-collection-searches -
139 votesStacey van Groll
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
The design includes the expansion setting to be remembered for the patron ie if they set it to be expanded, then it should stay as expanded for subsequent searches.
I suggest to open a case for a defect, if this is not occurring. -
0 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
I suggest to move this from the Alma Idea Exchange to the Primo Idea Exchange (if I'm understanding what it's referring to correctly).
-
34 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
I think the only variation available currently to the General System Administrator is "Upload Electronic Holding", per the menu option of Configuration > General > General Configuration > DARA Recommendations.
As far as I’ve ever seen, this only generates recommendations for the autoholdings configuration eg “Use Alma feature: Upload Electronic Holdings – Elsevier” if you don’t already have it set up. I don’t believe anything such as “important content news” is related to this?
Otherwise, the other one under category of "Use Electronic Inventory Features" is already available to several roles: "Electronic Inventory Operator - Limited, Electronic Inventory Operator, Electronic Inventory Operator Extended, Repository Manager". -
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacey van Groll
commented
Is this specific to when the item is in a course? I'm not seeing the described behaviour otherwise (as we don't use courses), as the permalink is by the ID. There is a variable by the differing key for aspects like the view, so maybe that is what is meant if this changes by course?
I think that we would get a lot of patron complaints if this was the behaviour. When the patron gets a pickup notice for an item on the holdshelf, they could bring the overdue item with them, have it returned, and then borrow their hold item.