Skip to content

Stacey van Groll

My feedback

185 results found

  1. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    This request might be better to submit for the Alma Idea Exchange, rather than Primo?

  2. 174 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  3. 91 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    I’ve been directed here by Ex Libris after putting in documentation feedback that I couldn’t see any information on expectation of a default for ‘Export to Libraries Australia’, which appears to be ‘Don’t Publish’. We want autonomy to be able to decide for ourselves what records are marked automatically to be externally published, and not be forced to have our records marked to publish to OCLC and not to Libraries Australia. MD Editor Templates are hardcoded to this as well. Also, the MARC21 Bibliographic Normalize on Save task options for both OCLC and Libraries Australia do not work (closed Pending Work Plan case from 2018). The only options are trying to catch as many records as you can by import profile management tag settings and endlessly creating sets and running manual jobs. This seems ridiculous for a LMS which purports to support us with the ability to streamline by automating our work. It seems like that’s only true when what we want happens to match what Ex Libris wants.

  4. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  5. 63 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    There is a CZ collection with 311 titles currently: 61393349280005265
    Strangely stated by creation date as the same date as this submissions was entered on 27th October 2020

    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  6. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    Noting that the gap exists also between Books and Book Chapters where if a Book has the Open Access indicator and included in the facet, this is not inherited by Book Chapters records of this Book, which are still dependent on individual provider to provide this information per record.
    Ex Libris advised this as an enhancement request, and they will not document it.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    I can't edit my idea for unknown reasons, so I'll add here adjustment of September 2022 for VE and November 2022 for Primo BO.

    Stacey van Groll shared this idea  · 
  7. 509 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    I've just had to submit a case to ask for details of 10 'records with exceptions' for the exact type of job for the original submission from 2016 of Filter set.
    I feel like Ex Libris requesting a list of prioritised jobs is quite simply just a stalling technique.
    Even if not, there are several jobs listed here already for years now. What is stopping these from being considered that exact prioritised list as requested and just get it done?
    It's ridiculous that there is not simply a link we can click on to download a file of these records, and we must instead put in a case.
    We all know how bad response times are for cases and my experience is that they are only getting worse. So we have to wait weeks and sometimes even months just for a simple report and in the meantime our work is stalled.
    Surely it is a better use of time as a vendor company for Development to do a one-time effort to improve the product so that customers can self-help, rather than pushing the burden of work to Support in a constant stream of requests.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    This is the top voted submission for the Alma Idea Exchange at 329 votes.
    Ex Libris states this as the preamble statement for this forum: "We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points."
    Despite this stated commitment, there is no response from Ex Libris in the 5 1/2 years since the submission was added.
    If there are no plans to deliver this functionality, then the idea should be Closed so everyone knows that Ex Libris will not fulfill it, and gets their votes back, and perhaps consider aiming for certain roadmap commitment via the NERS process.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    As mentioned by others, can Ex Libris please merge these two submissions into one, so that we can see a true picture of the desire for this functionality and don't split our votes?
    Right now there are 85 votes on one and 78 on another, putting this underlying idea at 163 votes. From a quick skim of the Top ideas, this would put it in the Top 30.
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/34532095-access-detailed-error-reports-for-all-jobs
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/15192714-improve-alma-job-reports-for-failed-record

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    As mentioned by others, can Ex Libris please merge these two submissions into one, so that we can see a true picture of the desire for this functionality and don't split our votes?
    Right now there are 85 votes on one and 78 on another, putting this underlying idea at 163 votes. From a quick skim of the Top ideas, this would put it in the Top 30.
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/34532095-access-detailed-error-reports-for-all-jobs
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/15192714-improve-alma-job-reports-for-failed-record

    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  8. 266 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  9. 96 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello,

    After discussing with the provider, adding Pressbook content to CDI looks like the most suitable solution to best represent Pressbook's  network.

    I reopened this idea and changed it's status to "Under Review".

    Thanks for your patience and support.

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    Last week it was announced that Pressbooks and Ebsco were partnering so that Pressbooks Directory content would be available in Ebsco discovery services.

    Thankfully it's indicated as non-exclusive, so hoping there will be a similar announcement for Ex Libris soon?

    16.3.2023
    https://pressbooks.com/new-features/announcing-a-pressbooks-ebsco-partnership-to-improve-discoverability-for-books-in-the-pressbooks-directory/

    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Link Resolver  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    Would you be able to provide some example links from your environment?
    We're working on transitioning from ezproxy to OpenAthens now and this caught our eye for something to be concerned about, but we're a bit confused without seeing practical examples.

  11. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    The 'Collection' facet can be used to do this for full text active collections, although the names may vary slightly from what the patron expects.

    nb I don't understand why this is only requested specifically for Primo VE, which would deliberately exclude Primo customers using Back Office. Of course all Primo customers should benefit from all developments for 'Primo' as a product.

  12. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    My submission is a lot more wordy with a user story, but I think this is the same requested concept that I have entered here: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/45235477-add-ability-to-save-a-record-with-a-label-while-in

  13. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    This suggestion is of course also relevant and would be of value for Primo customers, not just Primo VE.

    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  14. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    This is of course relevant for Primo customers as well, for returning results from CDI.

  15. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    This is a parity item between Primo (managed by Back Office) and Primo VE (managed by Alma), as there is a checkbox mapping table option to hide Personal Details section in BO.

  16. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  17. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    I agree that this is problematic behaviour. I haven't reported it but in hindsight think I should have given it seems a defect rather than desired intention design. I can't think of any reason why a user cancelling a search , the user continuing in UI to other activities, and then those other activities being disrupted by the search completing regardless would be deliberate. Cancel needs to mean cancel.

  18. 182 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  19. 32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  20. 25 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 9 10

Feedback and Knowledge Base