Diana Ferrandis
My feedback
27 results found
-
153 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
157 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
158 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
183 votes
Dear community,
The title and description of this idea were updated to better reflect the need. Please let us know if you have comments on this.
Thanks,
Tamar Fuches,
Alma development team
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
188 votes
Hello all,
We are currently reviewing it to assess its technical feasibility and implications. We’ll follow up once we have more clarity.
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
214 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
267 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for raising this idea.
This was part of the CERV cycle in 2025, but did not make it to the final list.
During the analysis, 3 possible approaches were discussed, each has a different estimation and effort:
Option 1: New dedicated process type
- It will be possible to mark specific items as "unavailable", similarly to the way it is possible to mark them as "missing"
- Items marked as "unavailable" will be considered as "not in place"
- The new "unavailable" option will appear as a possible process type in all the places where there is a list of process types, including configuration options such as Fulfillment Unit Rules
Option 2: Mark a location as "unavailable"
- It will be possible to mark a location as "unavailable"
- All items in this location will be considered as "not in place"
- The difference from option 1 is that when an item…
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
422 votes
Thank you for the suggested idea.
After reading it carefully, I understand that the main pain point here is the removal/fix of items already received.
To be more specific, the description of already received items should be updated to reflect the new pattern.
- Is this understanding correct?
- How often such change happens?
- Can you please add examples of the existing description and the needed update?
- Can the 'Update items using Excel load' CloudApp be utilized for fixing the description? see https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/appcenter/item-updater-by-excel/
Thanks for the collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
59 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
76 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
181 votes
-
37 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
120 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
94 votes
Dana Moshkovits
responded
This idea was mistakenly marked as completed and therefore I am setting it back to its original state.
The idea that was completed as part of October release is ‘Sort of holdings by location(A-Z) in Primo Getit’An error occurred while saving the comment
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
78 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
87 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
108 votes
-
129 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
-
69 votes
Diana Ferrandis
supported this idea
·
Hello,
We have post the same idea in this link. It had 22 votes but it was closed recently:
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/44146467-poder-configurar-la-ordenaci%C3%B3n-de-los-items-holdin