Naomi
My feedback
40 results found
-
167 votes
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
137 votes
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
83 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
14 votes
-
21 votes
-
98 votes
-
802 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
61 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
I agree. We would like to have the option, at least, to target certain letters according to the patron user group.
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Naomi
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
We would like to see more flexibility on all fulfilment notices.
-
74 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
It would be great to apply to all fullfilment notices.
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
103 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
I suggest unifying all the ideas regarding searching external resources feature, and consider changing it completely.
Naomi
Naomi
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
That would be a great idea! It's especially weird that our system number field is filled as a search criteria when searching external resources.
-
72 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
I agree and I think the whole functionality and look of "search external resources" should be changed to be more flexible and user friendly. Allow the user control the fields that are automatically copied from the original record, control the fields that are displayed, and add the refine functionality - as Anne asks here. Maybe this idea should be unified with this: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/34322349-search-filters-and-better-results-display-in-the
Naomi -
97 votes
Naomi
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
I would add also, let us control the results display, and show more fields on the short display such as call number. (We sometimes want to compare and see quickly which call number other libraries gave to the book we edit, without having to open each record.
-
59 votes
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
444 votes
This idea is under review for the NDE UI
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
The Manage Patron Services menu has moved to the new UI, allowing improvement management of the payment process from that interface.
I was optimistic about exploring this idea further. While I had hoped to prioritize this enhancement, it hasn’t gained the traction we typically look for to move forward. As a result, it’s unlikely to be implemented in the foreseeable future. That said, your feedback remains valuable, and I’ll continue to keep it in mind as our roadmap evolves.
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
I repeat Lynne Porat's question, I don't see this feature in future releases..
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
Or leave it as it was in the old UI.
An error occurred while saving the comment
Naomi
commented
We would like the oposite in the Purchase order screen. The save button is more prominent than the Save and continue button, and the confusion between the two leaves a lot of orders in Review. Perhaps the solution for both requests is to let the user decide which button will be more prominent?
Naomi, IDC library
-
96 votes
Naomi
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Naomi
supported this idea
·
I don't have votes, but I totally agree!