Naomi

My feedback

  1. 87 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  2. 162 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  3. 16 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  4. 209 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Naomi commented  · 

    I don't have more points to vote, but I agree completely!!

  5. 41 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  6. 348 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  7. 58 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content » New Collection  ·  Admin →
    Naomi shared this idea  · 
  9. 571 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  10. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi commented  · 

    I agree. Those rules are not friendly at all!

    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  11. 91 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  12. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  13. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Naomi commented  · 

    I agree. We would like to have the option, at least, to target certain letters according to the patron user group.

    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  14. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Naomi supported this idea  · 
    Naomi commented  · 

    We would like to see more flexibility on all fulfilment notices.

  15. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Naomi commented  · 

    It would be great to apply to all fullfilment notices.

    Naomi supported this idea  · 
  16. 236 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisitions  ·  Admin →
    Naomi commented  · 

    It would be great to even search the po-lines by interested user names. Right now, the search is only "yes-no" and the excel report, also does not include the names.

  17. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi commented  · 

    I suggest unifying all the ideas regarding searching external resources feature, and consider changing it completely.
    Naomi

    Naomi supported this idea  · 
    Naomi commented  · 

    That would be a great idea! It's especially weird that our system number field is filled as a search criteria when searching external resources.

  18. 73 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi commented  · 

    I agree and I think the whole functionality and look of "search external resources" should be changed to be more flexible and user friendly. Allow the user control the fields that are automatically copied from the original record, control the fields that are displayed, and add the refine functionality - as Anne asks here. Maybe this idea should be unified with this: https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/34322349-search-filters-and-better-results-display-in-the
    Naomi

  19. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Naomi supported this idea  · 
    Naomi commented  · 

    I would add also, let us control the results display, and show more fields on the short display such as call number. (We sometimes want to compare and see quickly which call number other libraries gave to the book we edit, without having to open each record.

  20. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    Naomi commented  · 

    I agree. Although we encourage patrons to create requests through Primo, by themselves, sometimes we do it for them, and would like to change the order of the tasks.

    Naomi supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base