Manu_Schwendener
My feedback
176 results found
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
-
144 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
What Jahn describes above leads to the following strange situation in our IZ, which is part of the same consortium.
We have deduplication deaktivated in our view.
In some cases, a link from 776 is created automatically, and works as expected
shows a link “Available in other form“, which links to this online version
https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&search_scope=UBS&tab=UBS&docid=alma9972335550005504&lang=en&context=L&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&query=any,contains,education&facet=tlevel,include,available_p&facet=rtype,include,journals&offset=0The field responsible for this is a 776 $t
https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/sourceRecord?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&docId=alma998305080105504&recordOwner=41SLSP_NETWORK776 08$iErscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe $tAnthropology & education quarterly
---
In many cases, we add a $x to the 776 field
https://ubs.swisscovery.slsp.ch/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&search_scope=UBS&tab=UBS&docid=alma99972970105504&lang=en&context=L776 08$iErscheint auch als $nOnline-Ausgabe $tRecht $x2504-1487
As we're in a consortium, all IZs see the same 776 fields. But that link only works in the IZs which _have_ the online version with ISSN 2504-1487.
What I would expect: that there is a check for this, and the link is not active, but the information stays visible, when the value in $x does not exist in the same IZ.
(Or, if that is not possible: 776 is hidden when the value in $x does not exist in the same IZ.)
What acutally happens: if no link via $x is possible, a title search is started.
Which leads to unusable results. Which means we had to suppress the display of all 776 with $x, also in the IZs where the link would work correctly.
This is an unsatisfying situation.
-
43 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Manu_Schwendener
shared this idea
·
-
73 votesManu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
We really miss something like this, see also https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/48220646-inform-patrons-about-pick-from-shelf
-
18 votesManu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesManu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesManu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesManu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
27 votesAdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesManu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
108 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
The screenshots for today's earlier post
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Another example:
The patron wants the edition from 2022.
None of the three FHNW libraries visible here have the 2022 edition.
They have 2017 and 2002.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Related, open for voting now:
PENH-I-28299 Add creator as field to suppress FRBR/Dedup
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Can't attach images when editing a post.
Here's the comparison between deduplication off (7 versions - the 2nd edition is the one which is missing) and deduplication on (6 versions, claiming that the 2nd edition is the one available in 4 libraries).
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Dear Yisrael
Here's an example
With FRBR on, but deduplication off: 7 versions [this is our productive view]
https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/search?query=any,contains,maissen%20geschichte%20der%20schweiz&tab=UBS&search_scope=UBS&sortby=date_d&vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9057215906606627152&lang=en&offset=0With FRBR and deduplication on: 6 versions - the two last titles from the list above are now one title [this is a test view]
https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/search?query=any,contains,maissen%20geschichte%20der%20schweiz&tab=UBS&search_scope=UBS&sortby=date_d&vid=41SLSP_UBS:withdedupandfrbr&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9057215906606627152&lang=en&offset=0When you click on it
https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9953948120105504&context=L&vid=41SLSP_UBS:withdedupandfrbr&lang=en&search_scope=UBS&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=UBS&query=any,contains,maissen%20geschichte%20der%20schweiz&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9057215906606627152&offset=0
you see “2. Auflage, 2010”, but this is just not true: the second edition from 2010 is the one that is missing, as can be seen in the first link.---
-
72 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
> Can it be advised what "GTI" stands for?
GTI, within Rapido
https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Rapido/Product_Documentation/08_Glossary
"Global Title Index (GTI)
Index of records from institutions that are Rapido members. When selecting the global index, you are actually searching in the Discovery Rapido Global Title Index + CDI."
The problem is that the titles can't be suppressed when the patrons have no way to get to the full text.
-
84 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
340 votes
This idea is currently under review for future enhancement.
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
I agree that search by publisher should be an option in advanced search out of the box, and
publisher should be a facet out of the box.Edit 2.6.2025: place 8 by number of votes at the moment.
-
585 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
This is on place 2 by number of votes now.
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesManu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
The possibility to show all facets is also the base for this to be able to work https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/34504561-allow-reader-to-sort-the-values-in-a-facet-by-a-z
Which also means: we have several facet types that would make more sense sorted alphabetically, but we can't use that setting because of the limited number of facets.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
More than 50 facet values: 180 votes in the Primo BO to VE Feature Alignment Project
-
441 votes
This idea is under review for the NDE UI
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
PENH-I-28349 open for voting now
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
NERS 8967, open for voting now.
This should be fixed
https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Release_Notes/002Primo_VE/2025/010Primo_VE_2025_Release_Notes?mon=202504BASE
"April 2025 SF: 05305640, 05310473, 05319841, 05328486, 05330867, 06027317,06259460, 06755228, 06877607, 06989963, 07214655, 07807403
When filtering by a specific date (with months) in Advanced Search, out-of-range records are returned. This has been fixed."