Anonymous
My feedback
25 results found
-
28 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
49 votes
Hi all,
Please note that this idea was mistakenly closed. It has now been reopened, and we apologize for any inconvenience caused.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
107 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
commented
Yes, mandatory fields in the exemplary editor that you can define yourself would be great.
In the case of the barcode, a differentiation would still be necessary: mandatory field, but for issues (like items which have been created via prediction patterns). -
7 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
commented
In addition to the missing zeros, it would also be useful if you could define a point and a commas as separators for the thousands and millions digits, e.g.:
D-4.123
III-1,109.345 -
51 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
commented
Hi,
I agree, at least 852|k, 852|h and 852|m should be separate fields in the XML so that the content can be printed differently on the label.
Thanks!
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
146 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
266 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for raising this idea.
This was part of the CERV cycle in 2025, but did not make it to the final list.
During the analysis, 3 possible approaches were discussed, each has a different estimation and effort:
Option 1: New dedicated process type
- It will be possible to mark specific items as "unavailable", similarly to the way it is possible to mark them as "missing"
- Items marked as "unavailable" will be considered as "not in place"
- The new "unavailable" option will appear as a possible process type in all the places where there is a list of process types, including configuration options such as Fulfillment Unit Rules
Option 2: Mark a location as "unavailable"
- It will be possible to mark a location as "unavailable"
- All items in this location will be considered as "not in place"
- The difference from option 1 is that when an item…
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
Yes, please add a such a box. This would save extra clicks ...