Anonymous

My feedback

30 results found

  1. 0 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 72 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 89 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 6 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  5. 30 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 110 votes
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
  7. 105 votes
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 208 votes
    How important is this to you?
  9. 316 votes
    15 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
  10. 4 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  11. 197 votes
    10 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 36 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  13. 63 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 131 votes
    How important is this to you?
  15. 68 votes
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 69 votes
    How important is this to you?
  17. 230 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 25 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We would like to massively change the Pattern type and Linking number fields. It can not be done either via API or with Job(Change physical items).
    The purpose of these massive changes at the item level (fascicles) is the automatic creation of field 866 in the MARC record for each journal holding according to the fascicles received in Alma. In our case, it is essential to make this massive change but it can not be done via job or via API.

    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Knowledge_Articles/Create_Summary_field_866867868

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 22 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  20. 38 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base