Kelley McGrath
My feedback
17 results found
-
140 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
52 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
135 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
307 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
120 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
25 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
73 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
213 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
284 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Kelley McGrath
commented
We improved this locally by creating a new field that displays 1xx if one is present and the first X characters from 245$c if there is no 1XX. We use this only in the brief results list. This works well except for a subset of very old records that have neither 1XX nor 245$c.
-
421 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
62 votes
Dana Moshkovits
responded
Clarification was provided regarding the functionality requested – which is not to delete portfolios but rather detaching portfolios from the collection and setting them as standalone portfolios.
Re-opening the idea.
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
204 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
-
148 votes
Kelley McGrath
supported this idea
·
I would like to see an option to control the database resource type with the bibliographic record metadata as we could do in PBO, which would decouple the resource type from the electronic collection type and provide more flexibility. It would also make it more consistent with the way other resource types work.